View Full Version : What does god think of gang bangs?
DMofD&D
06-03-2005, 12:38 AM
19:1 The two angels came to Sodom in the evening while Lot was sitting in the city’s gateway. When Lot saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face toward the ground.
19:2 He said, “Here, my lords, please turn aside to your servant’s house. Stay the night and wash your feet. Then you can be on your way early in the morning.” “No,” they replied, “we’ll spend the night in the town square.”
19:3 But he urged them persistently, so they turned aside with him and entered his house. He prepared a feast for them, including bread baked without yeast, and they ate.
19:4 Before they could lie down to sleep, all the men—both young and old, from every part of the city of Sodom—surrounded the house. 19:5 They shouted to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so we can have sex with them!”
19:6 Lot went outside to them, shutting the door behind him.
19:7 He said, “No, my brothers! Don’t act so wickedly!
19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never had sexual relations with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do to them whatever you please. Only don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
19:9 “Out of our way!” they cried, and “This man came to live here as a foreigner, and now he dares to judge us! We’ll do more harm to you than to them!” They kept pressing in on Lot until they were close enough to break down the door.
You know what to do. :)
thomas
06-03-2005, 04:17 AM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
The Judge
06-03-2005, 05:44 AM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
*with biting sarcasm* Yeah kill the gays just like "god" did!
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
I take it your taking this story literally? So god killed everyone in sodom because it's people were immoral? Assuming that every adult there was guilty of immorality, What about the innocent children? what about the pregnant women and unborn babies?
The Judge
06-03-2005, 10:29 AM
Just curious thomas - how do you feel about homosexuals? I'm relatively new here so I don't know to what extent you've expressed your views already as I'm sure you have.
The Judge
06-03-2005, 10:33 AM
19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never had sexual relations with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do to them whatever you please. Only don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
So the bible advocates raping virgins over homosexuality? Lot is spared (except for his wife) because of his "virtuous act" in trying to offer his fuckin daughters to be raped as opposed to these two guys he doesn't know getting buttfucked?!!!
What a lovely book
Philboid Studge
06-03-2005, 11:41 AM
And Lot's wife, of course, was told not to look back where all those people and their homes had been. But she did look back, and I love her for that, because it was so human.
I with KV on this. Ditto re Eve: Eating the apple was not only human, it was the right thing to do.
thomas
06-03-2005, 12:18 PM
Warning *morality alert*. Atheist claiming absolute moral values in post above.
thomas
06-03-2005, 12:19 PM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
*with biting sarcasm* Yeah kill the gays just like "god" did!
Well, their crime wasn't homosexuality was it ? Weren't they guilty of gang rape ?
thomas
06-03-2005, 12:21 PM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
I take it your taking this story literally? So god killed everyone in sodom because it's people were immoral? Assuming that every adult there was guilty of immorality, What about the innocent children? what about the pregnant women and unborn babies?
It's clear that God judges societies and holds us responsible not just for our own actions, but for our inaction in preventing injustice around us. It's a strange concept in our very individualistic society.
thomas
06-03-2005, 12:22 PM
19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never had sexual relations with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do to them whatever you please. Only don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
So the bible advocates raping virgins over homosexuality? Lot is spared (except for his wife) because of his "virtuous act" in trying to offer his fuckin daughters to be raped as opposed to these two guys he doesn't know getting buttfucked?!!!
What a lovely book
The Bible doesn't advocate or defend the action of Lot. It just records the actions of sinful humans and demonstrates that God will judge sin.
Philboid Studge
06-03-2005, 12:24 PM
Warning *morality alert*. Atheist claiming absolute moral values in post above.
Do I really have to preface every single statement I make with "By my way of thinking ..." or "In my opinion ..."?
One would hope such a thing would be implicit in that it is I making the statement, but I guess some people are just desparately seeking absolutes and so they find them, even where they do not exist ...
So your saying that it's ok for you that god kills children and babies because the society they live in is immoral?
Tenspace
06-03-2005, 01:11 PM
Individualism is religion's true enemy. Anything else is just a sparring partner.
Tenspace
Another brick in the wall
06-03-2005, 02:11 PM
The Bible doesn't advocate or defend the action of Lot. It just records the actions of sinful humans and demonstrates that God will judge sin.
God doesn't smite sinners as much as he used to. Why weren't people like Hitler or Stalin incinerated with bolts of lightning? God killed people for less serious offenses all the time in the bible.
Biofreak
06-03-2005, 02:37 PM
I wonder how such a godly man as Lot was able to get by with this when a couple of children were ripped apart by god's bear for teasing one of his old men.
Another brick in the wall
06-03-2005, 02:39 PM
Noah was saved because everyone else in the world was wicked. The first thing Noah did after the flood was get drunk and dance naked around his tent.
DMofD&D
06-03-2005, 03:20 PM
Really? I don't remeber reading about that in children's bible stories books. :D
Thomas, why do you have double standards when it comes to judging your god? Let's say someone killed my son, am I justified in killing his son?
ghoulslime
06-03-2005, 10:51 PM
19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never had sexual relations with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do to them whatever you please. Only don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
So the bible advocates raping virgins over homosexuality? Lot is spared (except for his wife) because of his "virtuous act" in trying to offer his fuckin daughters to be raped as opposed to these two guys he doesn't know getting buttfucked?!!!
What a lovely book
The Bible doesn't advocate or defend the action of Lot. It just records the actions of sinful humans and demonstrates that God will judge sin.
Thomas, do you believe god's action in this case to be just? :/
Another brick in the wall
06-03-2005, 10:54 PM
God destroyed those cities for homosexuality. Why hasn't god destroyed San Francisco?
ghoulslime
06-03-2005, 11:05 PM
WARNING: God killed Onan for masturbating! Keep this in mind next time you leap your lizard. I highly recommend choking your chicken in a childrens hospital intensive care ward or a school for the handicapped - someplace where god never looks. And I'd get one of those registry cleaners for your computer to wipe away all the traces of porno sites, just in case god checks to see if you were looking at porn. Better safe than sorry!
This message has been brought to you by Balaam's ass - the ass that saw the angel of the LORD. Remember, there is no ass like Balaam's ass! When you get the urge to take your staff to an ass, smite Balaam's ass. Because no ass will give you finer flavor. Enjoy the fine texture and aroma of Balaam's ass today!
whoneedscience
06-04-2005, 12:02 AM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
Now I don't pretend to know more about the Bible than a theist, but as I remember this story, Lot offered up his daughters to stop God's messengers from being beaten up (not necessarily gay raped) and that this was clearly an example of moral behavior from the view of God. The Old Testament may be complex (nonsensical would be a better word), but how do you explain how God supposedly went through the effort to save this one man in an immoral city if he weren't of outstanding morality and therefore condoned Lot offering up his daughters to be raped. And was this not the guy whose wife got turned into a salt lick for turning around? What was her sin there, not blindly following her husband?
If I were a theist I don't think I'd be defending this at all.
Sir Sin-O-Lot
06-04-2005, 12:12 AM
http://www.shopdonkey.co.uk/users/44/images/Jesusicon.jpg
I rest my case.
Another brick in the wall
06-04-2005, 12:15 AM
You forgot Democrat.
The Judge
06-04-2005, 04:37 AM
God's judgement on the city of Sodom was to destroy it for its immoral behaviour. Hardly and endorsement. Neither does the Bible endorse the action of Lot in this story, it just describes it.
*with biting sarcasm* Yeah kill the gays just like "god" did!
Well, their crime wasn't homosexuality was it ? Weren't they guilty of gang rape ?
Actually thomas they didn't rape anyone. You who claims to kow the scriptures so well apparently forgot that they were "struck blind" by the magic of the two "angels" before they actually DID anything.
Besides as Gen 19:13, the "angels" say, "for we are about to destroy this place, because the outcry against its people has become great before the lord, and the lord has sent us to destroy it."
So they were sent there with the mission and intention of destroying Sodom anyway before all the men from the city came out to "know" them.
I stand by what I said. god hates gays!
Lundie
06-04-2005, 06:48 AM
I stand by what I said. god hates gays!
then why did he make so many of them?
Tenspace
06-04-2005, 12:26 PM
I stand by what I said. god hates gays!
then why did he make so many of them?
Bad design by the intelligent designer. Otherwise, why would 1) 3rd and 4th born sons from a womb that has never birthed a woman have an exponentially higher change of being gay than 1st and 2nd born, or 3rd or 4th born with an older female sibling? (Ridley, 1997) and 2) individuals with strong anti-homosexual beliefs show stronger erections than a control group with neutral beliefs when shown gay porn? (Ramachandran, 1998)?
I think that maybe God needs to double-check his recipe. Either that, or he just keeps making them because He loves their fashion sense.
Tenspace
The Judge
06-04-2005, 12:28 PM
I stand by what I said. god hates gays!
then why did he make so many of them?
Sorry what I meant was IF god exists then he must hate gays - which is odd since he's supposed to love everyone equally mmmm :/
Philboid Studge
06-04-2005, 12:55 PM
WARNING: God killed Onan for masturbating!
Poor Onan, so misunderstood! He wasn't killed for choking his chicken, he was killed for pulling out -- specifically out of the coochie of his dead brother's wife.
Spurius Furius
06-04-2005, 06:20 PM
WARNING: God killed Onan for masturbating!
Poor Onan, so misunderstood! He wasn't killed for choking his chicken, he was killed for pulling out -- specifically out of the coochie of his dead brother's wife.
Thank goodness! I was really starting to sweat there for a moment :)
ghoulslime
06-04-2005, 07:43 PM
WARNING: God killed Onan for masturbating!
Poor Onan, so misunderstood! He wasn't killed for choking his chicken, he was killed for pulling out -- specifically out of the coochie of his dead brother's wife.
I suppose it is a matter of technicality. When he pulled out, one presumes he stroked it while he blew his hot load all over his brother's wife's face. Whether this qualifies as true masturbation or not, I cannot say for sure. Could one of our resident masturbation experts (ex-spurt - get it?) enlighten us on this very critical matter.
Spurius Furius, you log-flogging Atheist, you! You are still not in the clear on this one! I wouldn't be so sure your snake-stroking activities are not being recorded by an angel AS WE SPEAK! Surely GOD has ordained angels for the specific task of recording incidents of lizard leaping. Pray for forgiveness now, you shameless wanker-yanker! :D
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.