:)
 

https://proofofgod.wikia.com/wiki/Ca...cientific_fact

if you look in the technology section you can check out all my inventions

I couldn’t find the technology section.

I like how the jerk ignores the debunkings presented earlier to his psychic bullshit and repeats them anyway. Ho hum - let's see what happens if he posts any more links to his nonsense.

I updated the links... feel free to debunk any of them

it is the second to last section

Twat.

You invite me to trawl through reams of tedious, unproven, previously debunked horsewank? - and give traffic to the time wasting droolings of jerks (which includes you)?

https://cdn.someecards.com/someecard...Q4MTQ3YTRi.png

A bit of circular fucking off, eh?

I do like the Rational Wiki write up on the fucking woo-meister idiot Sheldrake.
Our resident lemon-head seems to enjoy wanking off to his bullshit!
I wonder if BummblePie's other sources can possibly be demonstrable frauds? :rolleyes: :lol:

Bill Tiller gets a fine write-up in the Encyclopedia of American Loons.

I guess we should jerk off to everything this twat comes out with .... :\

.... and we already pointed out that Jessica Utts' statistical shenanigans are probably another load of low-hung bollocks!

do you have anything besides ad hominems?

Do you have anything besides complete bullshit from demonstrable woo-kooks?

fyi, another ad homeniem

FYI: Te futueo et caballum tuum

another ad homeniem

... And another, twat.

Hey I thought we were just speaking Latin there for a second.

Satan musta taken over my tongue. And the dragon blood from the Nephilim!

Hallelujah in Jayyyyyzeus name!! Yahowaho ding dang damala ding dong!

I’m putting on my golden helm now! Gonna divide the universe by ZERO!

Omnia praeclara tam difficilia quam rara sunt-Spinoza

False. Like you, Spinoza wrote a lot of stupid shit.

Hey dumb fuck

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.

Teach a man to fish and he will eat for life.

Teach a man to worship and all he is able to do is pray for a fish.

Twat.

Teach a man to be Priest of the Fishermen and he gets free fish for life.

...and a chance to fiddle with the fisherman's kids.

From the news today it sounds like you can even get to being pope that way and get to wear a really big energy hat!

That was in no way an ad hominem.

I guess your right if by "kook" he meant; unorthodox person · individualist · nonconformist · free spirit · bohemian · maverick

I’m sure he meant maverick. Thin-skinned maverick by the looks of it, pardner.

For the avoidance of doubt ... woo & kook.
I don't give a flying fuck what StumbleBum thinks of the terminology - just as long as his lying, fraudulant shitstained heroes are exposed for the cunts they so obviously are.

I have personally taken over someone's mind with telepathy and biokinesis

I am inclined to believe I am not the only one with that ability

prove any of them are fraudulant

Look, bumble shitty, you fuckin' idiot. It's not for SOG to disprove your bollocky claims to twat fuckery and blowjobology. You're the one with the claims. Therefore, it's for you to provide the proof, you dense twat.

CrumbleBum will obviously scan & post the rather large cheque he acquired when he won the James Randi challenge! :rolleyes:

sog claimed they were fraudulent

someone passed the Randi challenge!

No doubt you'll provide evidence from your alternate looniverse.

.... and if you'd care to read the few links provided, along with the dozens of others freely available - you'll find plenty of explanation as to why your chum's kook-shite is considered fraudulent, unscientific, non-falsifiable, untestable donkey wank. They'll continue to spew out their crap as long as credulous gullible dolts (like yourself) provide income.

No. That was a response to your fuckwittery, not a claim of itself.

Twat.

FuckBumble has accused me of plagiarism - His words, not mine.:rolleyes:

supposedly someone going by the name yellow bamboo won

your links had ad hominem fallacy

No one ever won the randi challenge. Stop making shit up.

Of course they did - nicely interspersed with reasons why your bum-chums are a bunch of devious cunts and the crap they come out with shouldn't be taken seriously - but of course, that would never fit your woo-based agenda ....

can you quote even one argument ?

Can you read?

I thought so

No. You didn't. And that's why you believe the shit that you do.

Tit.