Raving Atheists Forum - Explanation of the Universe requires non conventional thinking.

Raving Atheists Forum (http://ravingatheists.com/forum/index.php)

- Atheist vs Theist (http://ravingatheists.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - Explanation of the Universe requires non conventional thinking. (http://ravingatheists.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17433)

Oh Andy boy, I love it when you talk dirty! :lol:
*Sigh* I thought someone in your 'field' would do better, but no, I'm finally going to have to settle on 'trolling fuckwit'.
Since you joined us - apart from the god-awful spelling, grammar and over-active imagination - you really are clueless.

Quote:

The Dingleberry wrote

R u talking about the Evidence for Jesus's resurrection argument

No, but now you remind me, it is a good argument from deluded bullshit.

Quote:

Peabrained Twat wrote

In science (have you heard of that?)

Thank you for reminding me of the bleeding obvious - but no, this wasn't amongst the shitloads of fallacies you've made since your recent return.
Keep searching, see if you can find them.

Quote:

Cuntmuffin wrote

Go wank yourself off

If I have a choice between reading your un-ending cosmic shite and a good wank, a flex of the wrist wins every time! :rock:

Quote:

Andrew66 wrote (Post 688738)

HaHa I gave a lot more than two options, and you think its a "dichotomy". What a fucking retard you are!!

Argumentum ad populum - eeeewwww latin, your so smart:rolleyes:

R u talking about the Evidence for Jesus's resurrection argument, because the historic pieces leading to the conclusion are is based on acceptence from a majority of Historical Scholarship?

You are so fucking stoopid its hard to believe.

In science (have you heard of that?) - where the science leads to policy statements which become adopted, scientists get together and make what are called consensus statements. There will always be a stoopid outliers who object, so it is majority rule. The public who adopts and benefits from scientific consensus statements (often in medicine) don't cry "argumenum ad populum" and go with the outlier's views - often in fact it becomes illegal to do so.

Go wank yourself off, that is all your good for - your mind and comments are shit.:lol::lol::lol:

Quote:

BlaBlaMeter -
how much bullshit hides in your text?
PR-Experts, politicians, ad writers or scientists need to be strong here!
BlaBlaMeter unmasks without mercy how much bullshit hides in any text.
A useful tool for everyone involved in writing!
Simply copy your text into the white field and check your writing style. It works with english text up to 15.000 characters (overhead will be cut off). For a meaningful result we recommend a minimum length of 5 sentences.

http://www.blablameter.com/

:bird:

I'm not sure if that's working properly Sin, I put a few of Andy's texts into it and it kept coming back playing Deliverance music.

I put the posts flagship prose into the BS meter, it says

Your text: 1983 characters, 318 words

Bullshit Index :0.16

Your text shows only a few indications of 'bullshit'-English.

This is pretty good, no?

Quote:

Andrew66 wrote (Post 688742)

Well their ya go - the Peer Review Process does work! :lol: