I must be slipping - I haven't pointed out what a bunch of two-faced hypocritical cunts the chief catlicker and his kiddy diddling henchmen are for at least two days. The Washington Post is one of numerous rags tracking the
Twatican's whining relating to secular laws that conflict with their stone age 'morality' :-
Quote:
Conscientious objection, he explained, should be seen as an “instrument for interior freedom” that individuals and “institutions such as the church or other religious confessions” can “legally turn to when faced with laws that, for their moral consequences, are in contrast with official moral norms affirmed by religious authority.”
|
In other words, WAHHH, we don't want to follow laws that we don't like, WAHHH
. It really is a good job the majority of the flock take no notice of the drooling fools in the bowels of Rome - and I object the laws on alcohol tax, so I should be entitled to not pay - free drambuie for all!