So who wants to point out to our resident lunatic that the first analogy is horrible because:
1.) The cracker-thief did not "take it in armloads." He took one.
2.) The cracker-thief did not "publically burn it so no one else can read it." Everyone else got their magic crackers. He didn't create a public spectacle, the cult did.
3.) The crackers are not distributed to everyone for the purpose of being eaten or potentially being eaten. They are given only to the cult members.
4.) Taxpayer money is not being mentioned as funding the distribution of the free publication.
I could go on, but she has me 'on ignore.'
