|
Disclaimer: I know jack shit about the science of this matter, just the logic.
It seems to me that his only pseudo-logical argument agaist a computer having the capacity to produce art is that art is simply too complicated. Is he somehow suggesting that computers are at their maximum level of complexity, or that there exists such a boundary, or that the human brain is well above this boundary? As far as I care, the brain is a computer; so there is clear proof that computers are capable of art.
|