|
Well, if you're not going to mix it up, I'm going to. Otherwise this gets very stale, very fast.
So, what would do you consider evidence?
Put it another way. You always say "you haven't provided evidence" or "that's not evidence".
Okay. Let's imagine a situation. Somebody has posted something, and you've responded something along the lines of "okay, that's good evidence. You have definitely given me evidence here, and I won't dispute that fact".
What is it that the person you're responding to has posted? What kind of thing?
$20 says it's theistic in nature, since you only respond to things that confirm your biases.
|