View Single Post
Old 06-25-2007, 11:16 AM   #37
Lily
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
nkb wrote
Lily,
Can you please elaborate what you mean by your use of the word "generous"?
Quote:
Lily wrote
He is very generous in his praise of Dawkins as a scientist and a writer.
and
That he can do so while being so generous in his assessment of Dawkins as a scientist and a writer is, I think, really refreshing.
Note: Bolding mine

Are you saying simply that he is praising Dawkins a lot, or are you implying that he is overstating Dawkins' abilities?
He heaps lots of praise on Dawkins. He was blown away by some of Dawkins' early work and still values him as a scientist. He is not persuaded by him as a philosopher, however, and makes a good case rebutting Dawkins' "scientifically grounded" atheism.
  Reply With Quote