Quote:
AtomJack wrote
You are thinking in a linear evolution fashion, where a change takes place, another change takes place, etc., ad infinitum. The reality is that the changes take place with a huge amount of samples over a huge amount of time (billions of years), in parallel, by lots of whatever looked like that chicken at the time. Some of the offspring live, some don't. It isn't like that hen walked out and did it the first time. These changes already happened, billions of years ago. If you can't wrap your head around that, or bother to go look it up and actually use your brain to sort it out, you are a lost cause and can be ignored. It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?". It's fucking stupid, and arrogant, to boot. You need to apply some reasoning skills to the problem, instead of coming here and acting like you are smartz, because you really aren't showing that trait.
|
You say:
“It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?".”
No it is not like that. You did not understand!
You say:
“These changes already happened, billions of years ago”
So?
I and you have not been at that time! The vision of what happened in the past is a debatable proposition. If you have not evidence, you should follow a valid logic. That’s it.
Nature is not a person! It is like laboratory with no experienced.
Hobotronic2037, I am not playing.
Waiting …