Quote:
thomastwo wrote
I still don't think that misquoting is a useful way to have a conversation.
|
I didn't misquote anything:
Mine:
Quote:
|
thomastwo: Math and logic are not science.
|
What you actually said:
Quote:
thomastwo wrote
Yes. But Logic and Math are not science.
|
Do tell me how that is a misquote.
Mine:
Quote:
|
Reality: Maths and logic are sciences.
|
Are you going to say that maths and logic aren't science?
Mine:
Quote:
|
thomastwo: Ah, but pointing out that I was wrong is a circular argument and pointing out that I made a factually incorrect statement means that you don't understand your own argument.
|
What you said about me pointing out that you were wrong.
Quote:
thomastwo wrote
This is a kind of circular argument. [...] But perhaps I was wrong and in fact you were meaning to create a circular argument? Please clarify.
|
And what you responded to Irreligious about me pointing out that you were wrong:
Quote:
thomastwo wrote
Davin found a definition that met the cause but without really understanding the implications for his and your argument.
|
There is no misquoting. But good on you for lying
