Quote:
The Judge wrote
You agree it's all that's required. Why do you therefore remain unable to concede that no extra ancillary bullshit need be bolted on?
:
|
This is silly
Lets say an Atheist Humanist faces 10 moral dilemma's, he is motivated to do the "right" thing in all 10 because of his moral compass - but he is also tempted not to, so lets say hypothetically he does 7 out of 10 things morally.
The same individual - only difference being a Theist Humanist, faces same 10 moral dilemma's and is tempted in the same way. He will also do the "right" thing in 7 of 10 things, but may do more things morally (i.e. 8/1, 9/10 or 10/10) because of his /her
additional motivation based on his religious faith.
Doo youuuu underrrrstannnnnd?
You must get this Judge, you're not stupid - perhaps your just playing me?
