Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
I don't know what you talking about smarty.
I assert that since Davin is incapable of saying anything supportive of me that his opinion cannot be trusted. If your too stoopid to understand this, it means that Davin is so partison (pro Atheist, anti Theist) that not matter what (regardless of what I say) he will always state negatives against me and any opinion or thought I have. It would be remarkable that everything I say or represent has no merit whatsoever, so Davin's opinion's are tainted and cannot be trusted.
Davin can prove me wrong by saying something supportive of me, but he won't (can't) - because he is blocked emotionally.
How is this a fallacy? - Sinny I'm surprised you seemed smart before.
|
You obviously were a classmate of JJ.
When are you gonna pay me that $10,000 you owe me?
