Quote:
|
cal wrote
We humans are bisexual by nature
|
Being a junior biologist atm, i find it hard to see that actually true. Bisexuality by nature is a rather large claim cal. What intrigues me the most is how you came about this conclusion? Where is the evidence suggesting (besides ancient Greece and Rome)?
I asked my professor about it, not refferring to anyone here, and he dissmissed it completely. I cant remember why, but i think he said something along the lines that humans procreate and it is our purpose in life to so having sex with a member of the same sex is not natural, its choice.
However, in recent studies on nuerology, we have found that some men ARE ACTUALLY women in nueroLOGICAL functioning. More over, perhaps this 'swapping' or 'switching' or pre-determined sexual preference or lifestyle IS natural and hence disproves any argument of instinctual heterosexual activity over bisexual.
So where do we draw the lines in the sand?
comments?