Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2007, 12:58 AM   #16
Sternwallow
I Live Here
 
Sternwallow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 23,211
Yes, the original universe, if it was a singularity, was symmetrical with zero width. When it expanded it entered a random distribution phase that we can see in the cosmic background. There was no plan or design or algorithmic pattern to it, just randomness. Following that, as it expanded and cooled, the four forces of the apocalypse began segregating and arranging things so we get the cosmic spider web that is the universal galactic distribution. It is still random because the forces acting on the early random seed retain the randomness mostly. Today we look at the distribution of galaxies and stars and there is no order because none was introduced since the disorderly BB. There has surely been change in the universe just as randomly distributed water vapor under one set of constraints forms itself into randomly shaped clouds under a different sat of constraints. There is nothing working in the background here to fool us into thinking the patterns are random when they are not.

It is a little like a logic problem with many steps. If the axioms are not true, no amount of proper, logically perfect manipulation will come to a true conclusion. So, mathematically, starting with random data symmetrical operations continue to yield random results.

"Those who most loudly proclaim their honesty are least likely to possess it."
"Atheism: rejecting all absurdity." S.H.
"Reality, the God alternative"
Sternwallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 08:33 AM   #17
Choobus
I Live Here
 
Choobus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: prick up your ears
Posts: 20,553
I think we all basically agree.

You can always turn tricks for a few extra bucks. If looks are an issue, there's the glory hole option, but don't expect more than ... tips.
~ Philiboid Studge
Choobus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 06:49 AM   #18
PanAtheist
Obsessed Member
 
PanAtheist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
PanAtheist wrote View Post
Reality is extremely diverse, and so it would make a lot of sense to me if randomness is a fundamental part of reality.

And so randomness built in to reality with quantum mechanics doesn't seem weird to me, it seems exactly right.

A physicist is saying exactly this, this week in the New Scientist.
(pg 14. It's all down to the roll of the dice, online here)

Quote:
New Scientist wrote
"I'm saying that essentially everything in today's universe is the result of a long sequence of quantum coin tosses since the end of inflation," says Stephen Hsu of the University of Oregon in Eugene. Think of a leaf fluttering on a tree. You might think a breeze is responsible, triggered by heat dumped in the atmosphere by the sun, its source, the nuclear reactions in the solar core, and so on. "What I'm saying is that, when you go back far enough, to the ultimate cause of anything, it's a random quantum event, something which happened for no reason."

I should be a physicist!

Healthy genes act as team-players. They are teamish!
Their winning plays are
salvations of an aliveness of which they are a part.
Only a fraction of genes are selfish/parasitic (and they
parasitize teams).
PanAtheist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational