12-18-2010, 03:18 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 832
|
Stossel is Awesome
Great Stossel vids:
Nancy said the earthquake would stimulate Haiti's economy?
I got an idea- Obama should recruit young people to break the nation's windows. That would stimulate window manufacturers. Then he could build a giant shield to block out the sun, which would stimulate the power industry.
Last edited by Brick; 12-18-2010 at 03:26 PM.
Reason: correction
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 05:21 PM
|
#2
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Some people think Paris Hilton is awesome, too. I guess it all depends upon your own unique point of view.
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 05:33 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 832
|
Can anyone explain why Cash for Clunkers was not an example of the Broken Window fallacy?
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 05:53 PM
|
#4
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Why don't you explain why it was? Personally, I'm not all that invested in either defending or demonizing the program without any evidence that it had a significant impact on the economy. If you think it had a deleterious impact, I'd be willing to read your rationale for that assertion.
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 06:15 PM
|
#5
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 3rd notch in the bible belt
Posts: 1,342
|
You disappoint me, Brick.
Christian: One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor. - Ambrose Bierce
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 06:31 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
Irreligious wrote
Why don't you explain why it was? Personally, I'm not all that invested in either defending or demonizing the program without any evidence that it had a significant impact on the economy. If you think it had a deleterious impact, I'd be willing to read your rationale for that assertion.
|
Cars were destroyed on the basis of driving up demand for new cars. I don't see how this is any different from smashing windows to drive up demand for windows.
The program drove up the average price of a used car by $1800. How is that good?
Quote:
GodlessHeathen wrote
You disappoint me, Brick.
|
Please elaborate.
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 07:00 PM
|
#7
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Quote:
Brick wrote
Cars were destroyed on the basis of driving up demand for new cars. I don't see how this is any different from smashing windows to drive up demand for windows.
The program drove up the average price of a used car by $1800. How is that good?
|
I thought the cars destroyed were clunkers. What normally happens to clunkers? Aren't they scrapped for the metals? Did the program require the demolition of used but otherwise perfectly serviceable Mercedes Benz's?
And wasn't the idea to stimulate new auto sales in order to stave off the demise of a U.S. auto industry that was in serious financial peril? Wasn't the aim also to avert harm to thousands upon thousands whose livelihoods are directly tied to assembling U.S. made automobiles, as well as protecting the jobs of multiple thousands more who are involved in the manufacture of ancillary parts for U.S. automakers?
If the program didn't do any of those things, then I suppose it was a waste.
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 09:27 PM
|
#8
|
I Live Here
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,193
|
What was that remark about Title Nine? I don't understand the outrage of spending tax money for public education equally on males and females. How is that anti free market?
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 09:39 PM
|
#9
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Irreligious wrote
I thought the cars destroyed were clunkers. What normally happens to clunkers? Aren't they scrapped for the metals? Did the program require the demolition of used but otherwise perfectly serviceable Mercedes Benz's?
And wasn't the idea to stimulate new auto sales in order to stave off the demise of a U.S. auto industry that was in serious financial peril? Wasn't the aim also to avert harm to thousands upon thousands whose livelihoods are directly tied to assembling U.S. made automobiles, as well as protecting the jobs of multiple thousands more who are involved in the manufacture of ancillary parts for U.S. automakers?
If the program didn't do any of those things, then I suppose it was a waste.
|
I think the cash for clunkers plan was ill-conceived. It was just another scheme by Obama which fucked not so rich folk, like myself. It certainly fucked those of us trying to buy used cars. One man's "clunker" is another one's only affordable mode of transportation, thank you very much. I can assure you that used cars at low prices are very hard to come by now. You are essentially forced to buy a new car if your old one goes, thereby paying way more than what you are getting, IMO. Personally, I cannot afford a new car payment on any new car, even the worst glorified golf carts. And, now, thanks to cash for clunkers, I can no longer afford a used one. It used to be that used cars were a good deal for folks like myself.
"If God inspired the Bible, why is it such a piece of shit?" (Kaziglu Bey)
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 09:40 PM
|
#10
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Brick wrote
Cars were destroyed on the basis of driving up demand for new cars. I don't see how this is any different from smashing windows to drive up demand for windows.
The program drove up the average price of a used car by $1800. How is that good?
|
Yeah, it sucks.
"If God inspired the Bible, why is it such a piece of shit?" (Kaziglu Bey)
|
|
|
12-18-2010, 10:12 PM
|
#11
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Quote:
lostsheep wrote
I think the cash for clunkers plan was ill-conceived. It was just another scheme by Obama which fucked not so rich folk, like myself. It certainly fucked those of us trying to buy used cars. One man's "clunker" is another one's only affordable mode of transportation, thank you very much. I can assure you that used cars at low prices are very hard to come by now. You are essentially forced to buy a new car if your old one goes, thereby paying way more than what you are getting, IMO. Personally, I cannot afford a new car payment on any new car, even the worst glorified golf carts. And, now, thanks to cash for clunkers, I can no longer afford a used one. It used to be that used cars were a good deal for folks like myself.
|
Then it was a terribly bad program for you, and I sincerely understand if you don't give a flying fuck what it may have done for the U.S. auto workers and those who work at plants that manufacture auto parts for those vehicles.
By the way, I'm partial to used cars myself, though not necessarily of the clunker variety. Two or three years old and under 40,000 miles is good enough for me. Though, I tend to drive my vehicles until they are no longer roadworthy. If the Cash for Clunkers program had the effect of creating a shortage of the kind of used vehicles I tend to buy, I guess I'll also get pinched when I go car shopping.
Edited: More bad spelling on my part. That should have been "Mercedes Benzes."
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 06:48 AM
|
#12
|
Organ Donator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Beastly Muck
Posts: 13,136
|
Quote:
GodlessHeathen wrote
You disappoint me, Brick.
|
That's like going to a porn theater and being disappointed that the seats are sticky.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
La propriété, c'est le vol ...
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 11:17 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
Philboid Studge wrote
That's like going to a porn theater and being disappointed that the seats are sticky.
|
Here's one just for you:
What? A communist government put out a bullshit statistic and showed a gullible foreigner a Potemkin village? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 11:41 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
ubs wrote
What was that remark about Title Nine? I don't understand the outrage of spending tax money for public education equally on males and females. How is that anti free market?
|
Title 9 forces schools to spend equal amounts on male and female athletics. Since there are more male athletes, their programs get cut to keep the numbers equal. Segment begins at 12:02.
|
|
|
12-19-2010, 02:01 PM
|
#15
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,613
|
seriously- I mean- seriously
oh and just to make it clear to Dick - I'm not laughing at the video
“'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what." Fry
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:52 AM.
|