Hen walks to her eggs and sitting on them!

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

Okay but which theory?

Ummm. I dunno.

How about your best, most scientific one.

[ahoba]

God phobia

See, I don't have any theory but questions.

So I am also waiting

[ahoba]

The questions are:
How many failure tries are?
Why do not we observe them although we have more than one million species?
Why do all chicken have the same instinct? do you mean there is only one instinct considered as beneficial behavior?
Why have the natural processes not made some changes on egg incubation process itself over millions of years like what happened with living organisms?
Why have the natural processes still not found a solution for living organisms that going to be failed? In other word, why did the natural processes not find a solution for tortoise with a short neck as simple example? This will make a problem with Natural Selection process itself!

Waiting

[ahoba]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tWLDhJ6mjQ

God phobia disorders: only chemical reactions can do that wow!

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

God phobia

See, I don't have any theory but questions.

So I am also waiting

Dang it.

You said God was theoretically possible.

But then, you can't put forth a theory.

Tease.

[ahoba]

Hobotronic2037 wrote

Dang it.

You said God was theoretically possible.

But then, you can't put forth a theory.

Tease.

Come on! I did not mean like that!
I meant if you say x is theoretically possible without evidence, I can say same thing for y! Understood?!

No God, no creator but please answer my logical questions.

Regards,

[AtomJack]

ahoba wrote

The questions are:
How many failure tries are?
Why do not we observe them although we have more than one million species?
Why do all chicken have the same instinct? do you mean there is only one instinct considered as beneficial behavior?
Why have the natural processes not made some changes on egg incubation process itself over millions of years like what happened with living organisms?
Why have the natural processes still not found a solution for living organisms that going to be failed? In other word, why did the natural processes not find a solution for tortoise with a short neck as simple example? This will make a problem with Natural Selection process itself!

Waiting

You are thinking in a linear evolution fashion, where a change takes place, another change takes place, etc., ad infinitum. The reality is that the changes take place with a huge amount of samples over a huge amount of time (billions of years), in parallel, by lots of whatever looked like that chicken at the time. Some of the offspring live, some don't. It isn't like that hen walked out and did it the first time. These changes already happened, billions of years ago. If you can't wrap your head around that, or bother to go look it up and actually use your brain to sort it out, you are a lost cause and can be ignored. It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?". It's fucking stupid, and arrogant, to boot. You need to apply some reasoning skills to the problem, instead of coming here and acting like you are smartz, because you really aren't showing that trait.

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

Come on! I did not mean like that!
I meant if you say x is theoretically possible without evidence, I can say same thing for y! Understood?!

No God, no creator but please answer my logical questions.

Regards,

Confirmed: You are a troll.

Thanks for playing.

[ahoba]

AtomJack wrote

You are thinking in a linear evolution fashion, where a change takes place, another change takes place, etc., ad infinitum. The reality is that the changes take place with a huge amount of samples over a huge amount of time (billions of years), in parallel, by lots of whatever looked like that chicken at the time. Some of the offspring live, some don't. It isn't like that hen walked out and did it the first time. These changes already happened, billions of years ago. If you can't wrap your head around that, or bother to go look it up and actually use your brain to sort it out, you are a lost cause and can be ignored. It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?". It's fucking stupid, and arrogant, to boot. You need to apply some reasoning skills to the problem, instead of coming here and acting like you are smartz, because you really aren't showing that trait.

You say:
“It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?".”
No it is not like that. You did not understand!

You say:
“These changes already happened, billions of years ago”
So?
I and you have not been at that time! The vision of what happened in the past is a debatable proposition. If you have not evidence, you should follow a valid logic. That’s it.
Nature is not a person! It is like laboratory with no experienced.

Hobotronic2037, I am not playing.


Waiting …

[Davin]

I think I'll wait for a coherent question.

Waiting...


Waiting...

...


...


...




Probably best to not expect one.

[ahoba]

I think you can't answer.

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

Okay! Existing creator is also possible theoretically, however, existing creator more logical!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

Pony up, bitch. Your theory, your logic, everything.

[Smellyoldgit]

ahoba wrote

I think you can't answer.

[ahoba]

Hobotronic2037 wrote

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

Pony up, bitch. Your theory, your logic, everything.

"A computer program must be created by a person"
If this is extraordinary claim I will answer you

If I say you are a human being although I have never seen you, is this extraordinary claim?

Come on !

Best regards,

[Smellyoldgit]