12-04-2017, 11:17 AM
|
#226
|
Stinkin' Mod
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,616
|
In my world, Piss Weak = 0
So fuck off dumb cunt.
Stop the Holy See men!
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 11:43 AM
|
#227
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
HAhahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahah- oh my God my belly hurts hahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahah!
|
I'm happy for you that your ignorance is truly bliss.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 12:36 PM
|
#228
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Smellyoldgit wrote
In my world, Piss Weak = 0
So fuck off dumb cunt.
|
Sorry no do overs!
Only "real" world counts.
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 12:37 PM
|
#229
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Davin wrote
I'm happy for you that your ignorance is truly bliss.
|
Bring something meaningful to the table and then we can seriously talk.
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 01:23 PM
|
#230
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
I think you're too stupid to deal with seriously. I've given you many chances and you concede to me at every point then declare victory. While I'm happy for you that you have shielded yourself from the unfortunate news that you're wrong, it doesn't change reality.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 02:09 PM
|
#231
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Davin wrote
I think you're too stupid to deal with seriously. I've given you many chances and you concede to me at every point then declare victory. While I'm happy for you that you have shielded yourself from the unfortunate news that you're wrong, it doesn't change reality.
|
Ad hominen attack
False declaration of victory in an argument
Meaningless drival.
Maybe a little less crack in your crackpipe and a lot more study of critical thinking and ethics with regards to dirty debate tactics?.
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 02:10 PM
|
#232
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Oh yes Smelley I forgot to ask..
When shall we schedule your baptism?
I need a little time to book a pastor and the venue, please let me know.
God Bless
|
|
|
12-04-2017, 08:04 PM
|
#233
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Smelley I feel sorry for you.
Just to make clear, I am convinced that you clearly don't believe the evidence.
I am not trying to imply that you do.
When you say "piss weak evidence" = 0, I think you mean that you don't believe the evidence, or you dismiss the evidence, or the evidence is so weak that in your opinion it is not worth any meaningful consideration.
But it is, factually, evidence. The Christian faith is based on evidence. - Period.
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 07:05 AM
|
#234
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
Ad hominen attack
|
Learn what that is, so that you stop embarrassing yourself by using it wrong.
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
False declaration of victory in an argument
|
Don't lie, I never declared victory. I don't see arguments in that way.
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
Meaningless drival.
|
Aw, so cute. You copying me makes it look like you think I'm superior to you. Now if only you'd start emulating my ability spell things correctly.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 08:40 AM
|
#235
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Davin wrote
Learn what that is, so that you stop embarrassing yourself by using it wrong.
Don't lie, I never declared victory. I don't see arguments in that way.
Aw, so cute. You copying me makes it look like you think I'm superior to you. Now if only you'd start emulating my ability spell things correctly.
|
On the above, I don't care.
You are just trying to distract from the topic because your loosing. It is you, and you alone who lie by continuously saying that there is "not a shred" of evidence in support of a God hypothesis.
Christianity is evidence based. There is at least a "shred of evidence". Tell me why I'm wrong. Smelley even has admitted it.
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 09:56 AM
|
#236
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
You are just trying to distract from the topic because your loosing.
|
I don't need to loosen anything, your argument is loose enough on its own.
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
It is you, and you alone who lie by continuously saying that there is "not a shred" of evidence in support of a God hypothesis.
|
That's not a lie, there isn't a shred of evidence that supports a god hypothesis. Shitty "evidence" doesn't support anything. Support for an argument or claim needs a foundation in reality, but you keep trying to build a house in the clouds.
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
Tell me why I'm wrong.
|
We have several times, you're just too stupid to understand. It's OK, not everyone is good at the whole thinking thing. You keep doing what you're good at: embarrassing yourself.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 10:10 AM
|
#237
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Davin wrote
That's not a lie, there isn't a shred of evidence that supports a god hypothesis. Shitty "evidence" doesn't support anything.
|
So that's where the debate has taken us, sad.
So if evidence, as determined by one in opposition to where the evidence leads, is "shitty", it isn't even evidence.
Sounds like your a Roy Moore supporter? Don't believe those lying teenage bitches eh!
Quote:
Davin wrote
Support for an argument or claim needs a foundation in reality, but you keep trying to build a house in the clouds.
|
Ok you've added a bit of meat to your contention.
Lets see if the evidence for Christ's resurrection is founded in reality.
1) The majority of "real" New Testiment scholars, including atheists, using their in-partial academic historic tools (for scrutiny), agree that the resurrection narrative, piece by piece, is credible. This is "real" evidence, founded in reality.
2) Historic scholarship "really" shows that the apostles and followers of Jesus after his "real" death, went on to preach what would have otherwise been seen by them as a failed religion, and they did so facing great peril. These "real" actions only make reality based sense if they "really" believed they saw a risen, post mortem Christ.
The burden of proof is on me, but I only need to show a "shred" (the term you use) of evidence that Christianity is evidence based. I've done so above.
I am not warranting the conclusion which the evidence draws (which demands a miracle, or extra-ordinary event), but the evidence itself is real, and founded in reality.
Unless you want to abandon historic scholarship as providing any meaningful evidence? Is that your next reply?
|
|
|
12-05-2017, 11:55 AM
|
#238
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
So if evidence, as determined by one in opposition to where the evidence leads, is "shitty", it isn't even evidence.
|
I'll let you try that one again, maybe you can make it make sense.
Quote:
Andrew66 wrote
Lets see if the evidence for Christ's resurrection is founded in reality.
|
And so far you haven't been able to support it. I know you're pretty stupid, but the consensus doesn't support a literal resurrection. If you were able to read, you wouldn't be coming here looking like an idiot. But go ahead and keep trying to build your house in the clouds. Even if it was as you say (it's not), none of that even points to a god. All it points to are people saying that they believed in a god. You're incredibly stupid.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 01:00 AM
|
#239
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,407
|
Quote:
Davin wrote
the consensus doesn't support a literal resurrection.
|
The problem with your statement above is that you are inappropriately conflating the primary evidence (the 4 resurrection points offered in my first thread - which are deemed credible by a majority the New Testament Scholars), and the opinion on the evidence, which - not counting the theist scholars of course - "doesn't support a literal resurrection."
All I'm try to say is there is evidence to support a resurrection.
The fact is , there is testimonial, historical evidence that
1) Christ died
2) His followers believed they saw him alive afterwards.
Evidence (1) + Evidence (2) -> provides evidence for Christ's resurrection.
Christianity is therefore evidence based.
You know Davin, you remind me of the CNN commercial with the apple. I present herein an apple, and you are doing everything (ad hominen attacks, destraction, conflation, misrepresentation, lies... the list goes on and on), my friend your not fooling anyone, and apple is and apple
|
|
|
12-06-2017, 07:16 AM
|
#240
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
Hey look, dumbass, I know you have trouble reading, but maybe give it a better try next time. The consensus of biblical scholars does not accept a literal resurrection. You have failed to provide evidence to back up your claim that they do and others here have provided evidence that they don't. Which means that your position it bullshit. You really need to look into why you can't provide evidence to support your bald faced lies. I'll help you out: it's because you're position is untenable.
Here are a few things your limited intelligence is preventing you from understanding:
1) Testimonial evidence only points to a person believing something, not to the thing that they believe
2) There is no existing testimonial from the time of this alleged Jesus' death, all of them come from 60-200 years after the alleged death
I know you're quite stupid, but maybe if this keeps getting repeated, even someone as idiotic as you may be able to catch on.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:12 PM.
|