Old 10-25-2019, 10:14 AM   #271
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
Is it possible to have an invention without an inventor?
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 10:50 AM   #272
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
I thought, "I've never heard of a christard referring to himself as a christard, that's a first for me." was a binary choice.
The statement, "A proton and an anti-proton, individually, are NOTHING. They are SOMETHING." is correct in the sense that Something is an educated guess based on questionable research, a figment of the imagination.
So if I were to ask whether you are a cunt or a wanker, (a binary choice) which one would you select?

Proton exists. Anti-protons exist. However, neither are germane to the issue of something being created out of nothing. What they do when the collide is also NOT germane to the issue of something being created out of nothing.

Now you stupid tit. Have you read the Fermi Lab paper which describes the experiments showing that something can be created out of nothing? If not, fuckin' read it.

If you have read it, explain how this violates any physical law at all, let alone the first and second laws of Thermodynamics.

If you can't explain, then shut the fuck up and stop pretending that you understand because it becomes more obvious, the more you post, that you haven't clue 1 about anything.

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 11:11 AM   #273
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
Is it possible to have an invention without an inventor?
In what way is this relevant to the question: how does the creation of something from nothing violate any physical law?

Or, are you going to continue to evade this question even though you stated this in an earlier post?

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?

Last edited by hertz vanrental; 10-25-2019 at 11:41 AM.
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 12:32 PM   #274
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
I do understand the etymology of christard and atheist, and in the context of this conversation, I chose christard.
I am more of a wanker.
Yes, I have read and understood the Fermin Lab papers.
The question, have I read the Fermin Lab paper is like, asking Smellyoldgit if he has read and understands the Raving Atheists Forum rules.
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 02:49 PM   #275
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
cowpat responds. What is the real, natural explanation of imagination?
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 07:17 PM   #276
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,589
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
The "fact" has never been a fact, and it is only a theory. The notion of particle pairs is highly doubtful. The First Law of Thermodynamics still stands.
When someone says 'only a theory', it demonstrates they understand as much about science as my left testicle knows about baking.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2019, 11:36 PM   #277
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
I do understand the etymology of christard and atheist, and in the context of this conversation, I chose christard.
I am more of a wanker.
Yes, I have read and understood the Fermin Lab papers.
The question, have I read the Fermin Lab paper is like, asking Smellyoldgit if he has read and understands the Raving Atheists Forum rules.
Yet again, the fuck wank evades the question.

SOG was indeed correct. Cowshit, you are full of donkey wank.

No fuck off.

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 07:41 AM   #278
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
Would you agree, the project officer who invented the weapon system QRC-49 used in defeating Russia during the Suez Canal Crisis to understands science?
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 07:59 AM   #279
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
Would you agree, the project officer who invented the weapon system QRC-49 used in defeating Russia during the Suez Canal Crisis to understands science?
Justify your statement that the spontaneous creation of a matter/anti-matter particle violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics you former fat twat and/or fuck off.

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:10 AM   #280
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describe some aspect of the world. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.
If evidence of a single violation happens, the Law is no longer a law.
Either spontaneous creation of a matter/anti-matter particle pair violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics and are no longer laws or the theory of matter/anti-matter is false.
Which is correct?
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:34 AM   #281
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describe some aspect of the world. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.
If evidence of a single violation happens, the Law is no longer a law.
Either spontaneous creation of a matter/anti-matter particle pair violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics and are no longer laws or the theory of matter/anti-matter is false.
Which is correct?
Desist from this bollocks, ex-fat boy.

I repeat, justify your statement that the spontaneous creation of a matter/anti-matter particle pair violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics or fuck off.

No. Fuck off anyways.

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:57 AM   #282
colpat
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cyril, OK
Posts: 112
I respect your desire to end this dialogue and will sign out. Our discussion is similar to the Bill Nye and Ken Hamm debate. Both are contemporaries of mine. Bill Nye was a Boeing engineer when I lead the team weaponizing the QRC-49. Ken Hamm was a close friend of Henry Morris, founder of ICR. Henry and I debated several of the world-renown atheists.
Shalom
colpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 10:04 AM   #283
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,589
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
Ken Hamm was a close friend of Henry Morris, founder of ICR. Henry and I debated several of the world-renown atheists.
Shalom
That would look so spectacularly impressive on your CVs - not so for the non-believers in bullshit.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 10:42 AM   #284
hertz vanrental
Obsessed Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
I respect your desire to end this dialogue and will sign out. Our discussion is similar to the Bill Nye and Ken Hamm debate. Both are contemporaries of mine. Bill Nye was a Boeing engineer when I lead the team weaponizing the QRC-49. Ken Hamm was a close friend of Henry Morris, founder of ICR. Henry and I debated several of the world-renown atheists.
Shalom
In order to believe in lard ass and his zombie son, jebus, christards must lie to themselves because the idea that two characters, such as they, actually exist, is too fuckin' ridiculous for words. The issue is that christards are just too fuckin' stupid to realise that they are lying to themselves.

cowpat is an example of just how stupid and deluded the typical christard really is.

The really sad thing is that cowpat, the poor fucker, actually believes in the wank that he's written.

Tien!

Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
hertz vanrental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 04:07 PM   #285
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,589
Quote:
colpat wrote View Post
...... Henry Morris, founder of ICR. Henry and I debated several of the world-renown atheists.
Jesus Fuck - we're blessed with the dumbest of the dumb!

Quote:
Wiki wrote
Henry Madison Morris (October 6, 1918 February 25, 2006) was an American young Earth creationist, Christian apologist, and engineer. He was one of the founders of the Creation Research Society and the Institute for Creation Research. He is considered by many to be "the father of modern creation science."[2] He is widely known for coauthoring The Genesis Flood with John C. Whitcomb in 1961.
Do excuse me while I go vomit ....

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational