I don't want to alarm anyone, but....

selliedjoup · 01-02-2013, 03:09 PM

my thread is gone.

Oh well don't matter.

So carrying on from the last, you think that your position is based on 'lacking a belief' however if you did lack a belief you wouldn't be here positing a lack of a creator, you would be lacking the belief of anything which there is no evidence for.

Such as:

-Evidence to justify any form of cause of existence;
- and an actually cause for existence.

So your "LACK" is rendered completely worthless. If you weren't taking an active position against one of things that you lack belief in, then it would be viable. But here you are, so it's not.

Smellyoldgit · 01-02-2013, 03:24 PM

I was in the process of sweeping some of Jerry's unwanted drivel into his 'master crap thread' when my PC froze & crashed. Once I rebooted, the tread had vanished.

In case anyone gives a shit, I've asked our uber-mistress admin to see what happened and try for a miraculous resurrection, but in case I've accidently killed it, those of you with extreme masochistic tendencies can just carry on here - no doubt the whole tedious exchange will be repeated anyway!

Irreligious · 01-02-2013, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Smellyoldgit wrote

I was in the process of sweeping some of Jerry's unwanted drivel into his 'master crap thread' when my PC froze & crashed. Once I rebooted, the tread had vanished.

ghoulslime · 01-03-2013, 12:15 AM

It had to be 50% an act of the gods!

The world shall mourn the loss of Jerry50/50's wisdom!

selliedjoup · 01-03-2013, 01:22 AM

Quote:

ghoulslime wrote

It had to be 50% an act of the gods!

The world shall mourn the loss of Jerry50/50's wisdom!

Nah just incompetence by someone who shouldn't have admin permissions.

All you need to do to get rid of me is rationalise your perspective.

Depending on the lack of evidence equates to a lack of belief in a cause for existence as well. Tell me why your position holds any relevance at all and why it requires you to be actively involved in having a lack of belief in other people's position(s).

ghoulslime · 01-03-2013, 10:38 AM

Quote:

selliedjoup wrote

Nah just incompetence by someone who shouldn't have admin permissions.

All you need to do to get rid of me is rationalise your perspective.

Depending on the lack of evidence equates to a lack of belief in a cause for existence as well. Tell me why your position holds any relevance at all and why it requires you to be actively involved in having a lack of belief in other people's position(s).

Lunatic!

selliedjoup · 01-02-2013, 03:30 PM

Just restore your backed up DB, don't say you don't have a lack of backups too?

I'm sure irreligious will have forgotten things he has the memory of a sieve.

NKB will have no idea how to formulate his atrocious analogies I'm sure they will only get worse.

Ilovejesus will just continue talking irrelevant shit.

Stoolspine can just cut and paste from other threads as per usual.

selliedjoup · 01-02-2013, 03:50 PM

yay science why did I ever think you could not answer all.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...se-debate.html

psychodiva · 01-02-2013, 04:25 PM

oh joy

ILOVEJESUS · 01-02-2013, 05:04 PM

Jerry can continue to avoid answering anything that challenges his belief/non belief in a god/creator. Good thing the thread is binned, it was fucking as circular as you can get.

selliedjoup · 01-02-2013, 07:03 PM

Quote:

ILOVEJESUS wrote

Jerry can continue to avoid answering anything that challenges his belief/non belief in a god/creator. Good thing the thread is binned, it was fucking as circular as you can get.

What mean asking you to rationalise why evidence must be coming, and you focusing on my claim of 50/50?

Are you able to rationalise it beyond the obvious "we need evidence to know something"?

ILOVEJESUS · 01-03-2013, 03:58 AM

Quote:

selliedjoup wrote

What mean asking you to rationalise why evidence must be coming, and you focusing on my claim of 50/50?

Are you able to rationalise it beyond the obvious "we need evidence to know something"?

Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.

ghoulslime · 01-03-2013, 10:39 AM

Quote:

ILOVEJESUS wrote

Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.

Irreligious · 01-03-2013, 11:12 AM

Why would this fool think that anybody would be alarmed by the loss of his thread? I hope it stays lost.

selliedjoup · 01-03-2013, 01:04 PM

Quote:

ILOVEJESUS wrote

Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.

If you ask what I believe the probability is, and you then go over and over the same thing for a few years then there's no where else to go, unless you haven't pegged that this has been going on.

Sadly your poor rebuttals still leave the best guess anyone can have at 50/50.

Oh so evidence should be coming so we know it exists? So it's not coming if it doesn't exist?

Tell me, how do you know we can assess everything that exists?