Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2006, 11:17 AM   #1
Sidulust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is a call out to all you Physic Geeks. Take a look at:

http://www.informantnews.com/starshi...crop/index.htm


And please tell me: Does Sutter have an accurate handle on the Physics of the Magnetron and what happens at 27 GHZ with H2O?

One request: Let's limit the scope of this thread to whether the decode of the symbols indicates valid science and the actual physics involved.

AND NOT to who left them. (This means you too Choo Choo Boy!!!)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 11:20 AM   #2
Tenspace
I Live Here
 
Tenspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rocky Mountains, USA
Posts: 10,218
"Crop Circles Decoded"

Are you serious?

He has an accurate grasp on something, but I don't think it's physics.

"Science and Mother Nature are in a marriage where Science is always surprised to come home and find Mother Nature blowing the neighbor." - Justin's Dad
Tenspace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 12:26 PM   #3
Sidulust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Tenspace wrote
"Crop Circles Decoded"

Are you serious?

He has an accurate grasp on something, but I don't think it's physics.
If you read on you'll learn:

1) That he was abducted.

2) That he has built it, refined it and patented it.

3) That the patents are being held by the Baptist Church (minor concern; I have indication that if they
were to build it and try to leave the planet that the won't get very far.)

4) That this is an anti-gravity device. It let's you fly, as in, flying saucer.

5) That crop circles are a prelude to Full Emersion First Contact with
a Carrot OR Stick Approach (remember my little "Mulch" posts, that's
the stick.) BYW, when you A-Wholes are ready, I'll a create a gate into
my web-site to bring you up to speed.

6) Fox News may be lurking, provided they are 'good' investigative reporters.
Don't worry, just be your raunchy selves, it's about time they learn that
atheist (& nontheists) are people too.

Oh, yes, and I can be a little Imp when I want to be.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 12:40 PM   #4
RenaissanceMan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah, this is what happens when people with web sites huff too much paint.

Kids! Don't huff paint!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 02:22 PM   #5
Silentknight
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Sidulust wrote
This is a call out to all you Physic Geeks. Take a look at:

http://www.informantnews.com/starshi...crop/index.htm


And please tell me: Does Sutter have an accurate handle on the Physics of the Magnetron and what happens at 27 GHZ with H2O?

One request: Let's limit the scope of this thread to whether the decode of the symbols indicates valid science and the actual physics involved.

AND NOT to who left them. (This means you too Choo Choo Boy!!!)
I'm still not entirely convinced that site isn't a parody site. If it is then it's some of the funniest shit I've read today. If it isn't then this guy needs to seek professional help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 02:46 PM   #6
Sidulust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Be a skeptical as you want. All I'm asking is for someone
with enough intellectual chops to look at the Physics involved.

Until then we should reserve judgment as to the validity.

So think of this in terms of scientific approach.

The theory is:

Man gets abducted, imprinted with plans for new technology,
designs, builds, refines and patents.

Substantiating the physics would substantiate his claim.

In other words, if the physics holds up...

Not asking for serious stretch of the imagination here guys, those SF
fans (i.e. Star Trek, STNG) out there know that First Contact is a unique
situation and my theory is we are in a prelude to a First Contact situation.
My probabilities of this being true have risen from .3 to .36 to above .5 based upon
my own research. And that happen in this last week after studying this for about 30 years.

The alternative here is to keep you mind closed to the possibility of this being true, in which case, I can only ask:

How you any different than the Bible thumpers who can't see past the
End-Of-The-World-I-Hope-I-Get -Taken-In-The-Rapture scenario.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 02:51 PM   #7
Rat Bastard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Short trolling stint provides:

http://ask.yahoo.com/20020802.html

Conspiracy theists (sic) claim this phenomenon is still not explained and/or covered up by various intelligence agencies.

BTW, any takers want to know how many people are looking for Nessie, still? In spite of the fact that the perpetrator stepped forward, years ago?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 03:02 PM   #8
Sidulust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
logarithm wrote
Short trolling stint provides:

http://ask.yahoo.com/20020802.html

Conspiracy theists (sic) claim this phenomenon is still not explained and/or covered up by various intelligence agencies.

BTW, any takers want to know how many people are looking for Nessie, still? In spite of the fact that the perpetrator stepped forward, years ago?
Have you looked at the complexity of some of the circles???

Anyways, as I requested let's limit the scope to the Physics and the
electro-magnetism involved regardless of where in comes from.

Or are we afraid that it just might be something. Hmmmmm????
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 04:04 PM   #9
Rat Bastard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OK, I did a patent search at the US Patent and Trade Office. The patent claimed has nothing in it, bingo, zip, { }. He alleges a perpetual motion machine. Busted. If anybody wants to turn this into another debate thread, go ahead. The machine looks cool, but is a hoax. Next time, I will just judge it from the front door, the poser's site. My bogosity detector gave me the right result up front. And just because crop circles are complex and elegant doesn't mean they are not man-made.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 04:56 PM   #10
Big Bang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i got an idea for a new power source: the unused brain cells from christians. i'm not sure how to convert that to power, but theirs got to be alot of them!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 05:47 PM   #11
whoneedscience
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh damn, Sid. :lol:

Where'd you find this nut?

I especially like the "3.3 volts of electrical energy emitted" part, as if voltage were a measure of energy that could be "emitted" as a "force behind currant" and then held in a "diode/capacitor circuit", all through a particle we "have not yet discovered, much less named". I guess it'd be somewhat redundant for me to point out that this is absurd.

The descriptions of his plans for "harnessing centrifugal force" are equally hilarious.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 05:50 PM   #12
Choobus
I Live Here
 
Choobus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: prick up your ears
Posts: 20,553
just when you think that perpetual motion machines are a thing of the past, you get some tard like this. It's all great comedy though.

You can always turn tricks for a few extra bucks. If looks are an issue, there's the glory hole option, but don't expect more than ... tips.
~ Philiboid Studge
Choobus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 07:55 PM   #13
Sidulust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
that's what i love about you guys, you don't hold back,

thanks for the insights, it gives me something to work with
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006, 02:34 PM   #14
Rat Bastard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why, Sid you writin' some SciFi? :D
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2006, 04:17 PM   #15
Rat Bastard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Choobus wrote
just when you think that perpetual motion machines are a thing of the past, you get some tard like this. It's all great comedy though.
No, No, No, you have it all WRONG! Perpetual machines are our answer for the FUTURE! :lol::lol::lol::rolleyes:
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational