Old 07-02-2013, 02:10 PM   #1
Saturday
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
Abortion

Hey guys,

Is any atheist or secularist here a pro-lifer? And why?

Just curious.
Saturday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 02:48 PM   #2
Michael
Obsessed Member
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,457
My opinion used to be that whilst I was absolutely for the right to make the choice for yourself, I preferred to idea of adoption over abortion.

Now that's changed for numerous reasons, one of the more out there ones being human overpopulation. We're not good at managing resources, see, and anything that limits population growth needs to at least be re-assessed.*



*now watch someone try to say this means I support genocide or something.
Michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 08:05 PM   #3
Saturday
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
Very true. We need to limit population growth. I don't know if that should be done via abortions but yeah, we need people to stop making copies asap.

I think I am where you were. I don't think abortion is necessarily immoral. I was fairly undecided for awhile. I'm just wondering if anyone ever had a valid and sound secular argument against abortion legally or morally because I haven't encountered one yet.
Saturday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 01:02 AM   #4
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,521
.... but aborted foetuses are so delicious - especially with extra garlic!

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2013, 05:58 PM   #5
Clifton
Member
 
Clifton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mississippi- US
Posts: 114
Hello everyone,

I'm a pro-lifer because I like living and think the fetus might enjoy it as well. I also think women should have the choice to strangle that little fucker with its own umbilical cord, just don't ask me to help. I have better things to do.
Clifton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2013, 06:22 AM   #6
Saturday
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
Quote:
Clifton wrote View Post
Hello everyone,

I'm a pro-lifer because I like living and think the fetus might enjoy it as well. I also think women should have the choice to strangle that little fucker with its own umbilical cord, just don't ask me to help. I have better things to do.
Well, it's hard to detect sarcasm on the internet.

Usually "pro-life" is mutually exclusive with pro choice. So you're either pro life or pro choice. If what you said wasn't sarcasm, then you're not a pro-lifer, you're a pro choicer.
Saturday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2013, 07:18 AM   #7
Clifton
Member
 
Clifton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mississippi- US
Posts: 114
Quote:
Saturday wrote View Post
Well, it's hard to detect sarcasm on the internet.

Usually "pro-life" is mutually exclusive with pro choice. So you're either pro life or pro choice. If what you said wasn't sarcasm, then you're not a pro-lifer, you're a pro choicer.
I don't find it that simple. It's not black or white for me. Every situation can be different. I would base what I feel right or wrong on each account. I could choose to ignore the majority of abortions in feeling that they are none of my business. I could also choose to intervene and totally reject what i feel to be a horrible action.

Why can't I be both?
Clifton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2014, 02:37 AM   #8
davros of skaro
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 64
Just listen to Bindi.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYbNbJG3-1k
davros of skaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 10:53 PM   #9
Saturday
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 216
welp, I wasn't specifically thinking about overpopulation. But she reiterates a great point. There are too many damn people on this planet.
Saturday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 02:40 AM   #10
ILOVEJESUS
I Live Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
And more to come!!

A theist is just an atheist with a space in it.
ILOVEJESUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 07:03 PM   #11
jimmyjet
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 159
this is not a believer/non-believer issue, although many people try to make it out to be one.

biology 101 - each of our lives starts with the joining of a sperm and an egg.

people make the ridiculous mistake of thinking that it is not a human being because it has not formed a head, a foot, etc.

that is so not the point. this is how each and every one of our lives start. we dont look the same as an 18-year-old adult. but just go to some hospice for a day, and take a look at a shriveled up 50 pound person waiting to die, and they dont look very much like an 18-year-old adult either.

it is even more ridiculous to think that one can pinpoint an exact microsecond when the non-human-being becomes a human being.

the only exact point is at conception.

i have a highly atheistic friend who gets very irate when he hears that only theists are pro-life. he remarks very sarcastically "do they think that they are the only ones who know what is fair ?"

many people do think that atheists are all pro-choice, and theists tend to be all pro-life. that just aint true, by a long shot.

in polls taken, christians dont have much greater a percentage of being pro-life than non-christians or non-believers.

i did not listen to the bindi url, cuz i got the drift of what was said from saturday's post.

what ridiculous logic !! the ends do not justify the means. by using that exact same logic, i could say lets just go kill 75% of the population. that too, would solve the population problem.

just cuz we can solve a problem by a particular means, does not justify the means being used.

the unborn child has done nothing wrong. it is their parents who are 100% responsible for their actions.

why not just cut off the guy's penis, and sew up the vagina for people who can not be responsible for their sexual actions ?

this society is so dysfunctional. and we have almost totally forgotten about taking responsibility for our actions. it is not the other guy's fault. we need only look in the mirror.
jimmyjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 12:26 AM   #12
Kinich Ahau
Obsessed Member
 
Kinich Ahau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Great Ocean Road
Posts: 2,896
Surprise, surprise!

Oh and fuck off!

Once you are dead, you are nothing. Graffito, Pompeii
Kinich Ahau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 04:44 AM   #13
Michael
Obsessed Member
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,457
Quote:
jimmyjet wrote View Post
this is not a believer/non-believer issue, although many people try to make it out to be one.
In general I agree with this.

Quote:
biology 101 - each of our lives starts with the joining of a sperm and an egg.
Not so much with this. But I can certainly see why some might argue this.
However, society disagrees. We don't celebrate our 'conception day' and say "I am 30 today because today was the day my sperm joined with my egg". No. Society says our life begins the day we're born, and if you count your age by that measure, so do you.


Quote:
people make the ridiculous mistake of thinking that it is not a human being because it has not formed a head, a foot, etc.

that is so not the point. this is how each and every one of our lives start. we dont look the same as an 18-year-old adult. but just go to some hospice for a day, and take a look at a shriveled up 50 pound person waiting to die, and they dont look very much like an 18-year-old adult either.

it is even more ridiculous to think that one can pinpoint an exact microsecond when the non-human-being becomes a human being.
This is fallacious, as your argument first assumes that we even need to pinpoint an *exact* moment. Who ever said we did?
Can you pinpoint the exact generation that was the first homo sapiens sapiens and does that mean diddly squat for evolutionary purposes?


Quote:
the only exact point is at conception.

i have a highly atheistic friend who gets very irate when he hears that only theists are pro-life. he remarks very sarcastically "do they think that they are the only ones who know what is fair ?"

many people do think that atheists are all pro-choice, and theists tend to be all pro-life. that just aint true, by a long shot.
Except We're yet to hear a good secular argument against it, so most that argue most passionately for it tend to be theistic in nature.
Beyond "imagine if you had been aborted", that is. If I had, I wouldn't know the difference, as i wouldn't exist, or have ever really existed.
And if you are going to make that argument, than any wastage of potential life can be looked at similarly, and periods and masturbation suddenly become a lot more deadly. "Imagine if you had been ejaculated into a tissue instead".

Quote:
in polls taken, christians dont have much greater a percentage of being pro-life than non-christians or non-believers.

i did not listen to the bindi url, cuz i got the drift of what was said from saturday's post.

what ridiculous logic !! the ends do not justify the means. by using that exact same logic, i could say lets just go kill 75% of the population. that too, would solve the population problem.
Took longer than I thought, but I totally called someone equating this with genocide.


Quote:
just cuz we can solve a problem by a particular means, does not justify the means being used.
Okay. No general argument here on that, except that the context in which you're saying it is faulty, since you just wrongly equated abortion with genocide.

Quote:
the unborn child has done nothing wrong. it is their parents who are 100% responsible for their actions.
And the unborn child is perfectly welcome to gestate outside of it's mother's body then. Until then it is a trespasser in someone else's body, and if it is a human being, then it is forcibly inside a woman's uterus without permission.
We wouldn't accept a human being forcing themselves on a woman's body like that at any other time so you're saying that a child has more rights to a woman's body than the woman does?

Quote:
why not just cut off the guy's penis, and sew up the vagina for people who can not be responsible for their sexual actions ?
That's a little excessive. And disturbing.

Michael...you are correct
- selliedjoup
Michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 06:42 AM   #14
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,521
Methinks we have a slimeball in our midst - still carrying full catlick credentials.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 06:51 AM   #15
ILOVEJESUS
I Live Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
Quote:
Smellyoldgit wrote View Post
Methinks we have a slimeball in our midst - still carrying full catlick credentials.
No way....ya think?

A theist is just an atheist with a space in it.
ILOVEJESUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational