Proof of God

[Tenspace]

Eva wrote

love your cheerleader booties, ten.

And, they're flameproof, which is a necessity when cheerleading in Hell!

[Riddler]

Sorry to go off-topic, but did anyone here see this film?




Good, wasn't it?

[antix]

Tenspace wrote

And, they're flameproof, which is a necessity when cheerleading in Hell!

No offense, Ten, but I pictured Hell's cheerleaders to have a bit less hair on their faces, and perhaps wear something more revealing. Not to mention that a helmet makes for a terrible pom pom.

Then again, I guess it is supposed to be Hell...

[anthonyjfuchs]

ubs wrote

Did someone say profit?

These guys?

[Professor Chaos]

[psychodiva]

Is this idiot still here? how much longer is he going to drone on about his stupid 'proof' that proves nothing?

of course I expexct something from him now saying I am too dumb/stupid/ill-educated or British to understand his 'proof' lol- a but like LillyButt really - *sigh* I want a less boring group of troll christians next time please

[antix]

psychodiva wrote

Is this idiot still here? how much longer is he going to drone on about his stupid 'proof' that proves nothing?

of course I expexct something from him now saying I am too dumb/stupid/ill-educated or British to understand his 'proof' lol- a but like LillyButt really - *sigh* I want a less boring group of troll christians next time please

I kind of like having the president of the foil hat club amongst us. It's provided us with a goldmine of mockworthy drivel for the more creative members to rip to shreds.

Not to mention the self mockery that it unwittingly inflicts upon itself for our amusement is at a level I've not seen around here in some time.

[psychodiva]

antix wrote

I kind of like having the president of the foil hat club amongst us. It's provided us with a goldmine of mockworthy drivel for the more creative members to rip to shreds.

Not to mention the self mockery that it unwittingly inflicts upon itself for our amusement is at a level I've not seen around here in some time.

there is that of course

maybe I should restrict myself to reading only the excellent put-downs and ass-rippings from our esteemed members and not the drivel he posts

[dogpet]

Tenspace wrote

Man, I used to have a Mazda RX-7, too! Five of them, actually. There's nothing like a rotary combustion engine sucking in that ionized fuel vapor and turning it into heart-stopping, scream-inducing horsepower!

Yes but sid has invented the superwanker.

[psychodiva]

dogpet wrote

Yes but sid has invented the superwanker.

now that is just one too many images in my head that I don't want

[ghoulslime]

ubs wrote

Very well. A brown flavored crayon will render a false profit. Follow not he who uses common operators to prove God. God requires mathematical Goperators, like

✉ The sign for knowledge that cannot be revealed atheist morons
⬄ The sign for blind faith
☑ The sign of conversion, and

✈ The sign for skyscrapers

I realize that it is a wicked generation that seeks signs, but all of your signs seem to be missing on my computer screen. Do you have fonts that I don’t have? I’m just getting squares here, man. This is making me nervous. I’m afraid there might be some important clue that I am missing to the universal equation.

[Whisper]

It took me a while, but I finally read it all. And whoo-boy is that some effed up stuff c.c This guy is seriously loopy - Illuminati? Moon Bases? Global Medical Conspiracy? Whoo.

He's obviously more than a little bit insane. And his 'proof' is just headache inducing (sorry, not a philospher or a scientist, reading that TL;DR post just made me go 'duuuh whut?' and I don't mind admitting it)

[Sternwallow]

dogpet wrote

Hi Stern

G+GxGn=G

Hi there

Sorry I am so tardy working through the threads, there were 568 e-mails for new posts when I returned home.

[Sternwallow]

ILOVEJESUS wrote

what was wrong stern? hope nothing serious as i am pleased to see you back if im honest

Fairly simple collision, totaled car, very close call, getting better. Thanks.

[Sternwallow]

MySiddhi wrote

This post that I am typing right now would be included in "everything" yet it did not exist beforehand therefore everything has not always existed.

If you want to play semantics you could say; everything exists (before I created this post it wasn't a thing).

But you cannot say; everything has always existed. Unless you want to be absurd.

This post is not a new thing; it is a rearrangement of existing things. Every moment in the universe is a new and at least slightly different configuration of its components. The components last as long as the universe, but the patterns do not.

Thus, there has been no creation (ex nihilo, if even then) since the BB.