09-02-2015, 11:04 AM
|
#256
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
Okay but which theory?
|
Ummm. I dunno.
How about your best, most scientific one.
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 12:17 PM
|
#257
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
God phobia
See, I don't have any theory but questions.
So I am also waiting
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 12:35 PM
|
#258
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
The questions are:
How many failure tries are?
Why do not we observe them although we have more than one million species?
Why do all chicken have the same instinct? do you mean there is only one instinct considered as beneficial behavior?
Why have the natural processes not made some changes on egg incubation process itself over millions of years like what happened with living organisms?
Why have the natural processes still not found a solution for living organisms that going to be failed? In other word, why did the natural processes not find a solution for tortoise with a short neck as simple example? This will make a problem with Natural Selection process itself!
Waiting
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 02:49 PM
|
#260
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
God phobia
See, I don't have any theory but questions.
So I am also waiting
|
Dang it.
You said God was theoretically possible.
But then, you can't put forth a theory.
Tease.
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 08:28 PM
|
#261
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Hobotronic2037 wrote
Dang it.
You said God was theoretically possible.
But then, you can't put forth a theory.
Tease.
|
Come on! I did not mean like that!
I meant if you say x is theoretically possible without evidence, I can say same thing for y! Understood?!
No God, no creator but please answer my logical questions.
Regards,
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 09:16 PM
|
#262
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 292
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
The questions are:
How many failure tries are?
Why do not we observe them although we have more than one million species?
Why do all chicken have the same instinct? do you mean there is only one instinct considered as beneficial behavior?
Why have the natural processes not made some changes on egg incubation process itself over millions of years like what happened with living organisms?
Why have the natural processes still not found a solution for living organisms that going to be failed? In other word, why did the natural processes not find a solution for tortoise with a short neck as simple example? This will make a problem with Natural Selection process itself!
Waiting
|
You are thinking in a linear evolution fashion, where a change takes place, another change takes place, etc., ad infinitum. The reality is that the changes take place with a huge amount of samples over a huge amount of time (billions of years), in parallel, by lots of whatever looked like that chicken at the time. Some of the offspring live, some don't. It isn't like that hen walked out and did it the first time. These changes already happened, billions of years ago. If you can't wrap your head around that, or bother to go look it up and actually use your brain to sort it out, you are a lost cause and can be ignored. It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?". It's fucking stupid, and arrogant, to boot. You need to apply some reasoning skills to the problem, instead of coming here and acting like you are smartz, because you really aren't showing that trait.
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 09:30 PM
|
#263
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
Come on! I did not mean like that!
I meant if you say x is theoretically possible without evidence, I can say same thing for y! Understood?!
No God, no creator but please answer my logical questions.
Regards,
|
Confirmed: You are a troll.
Thanks for playing.
|
|
|
09-02-2015, 10:44 PM
|
#264
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
AtomJack wrote
You are thinking in a linear evolution fashion, where a change takes place, another change takes place, etc., ad infinitum. The reality is that the changes take place with a huge amount of samples over a huge amount of time (billions of years), in parallel, by lots of whatever looked like that chicken at the time. Some of the offspring live, some don't. It isn't like that hen walked out and did it the first time. These changes already happened, billions of years ago. If you can't wrap your head around that, or bother to go look it up and actually use your brain to sort it out, you are a lost cause and can be ignored. It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?". It's fucking stupid, and arrogant, to boot. You need to apply some reasoning skills to the problem, instead of coming here and acting like you are smartz, because you really aren't showing that trait.
|
You say:
“It's like the argument about "If we came from dust, why is there still dust?".”
No it is not like that. You did not understand!
You say:
“These changes already happened, billions of years ago”
So?
I and you have not been at that time! The vision of what happened in the past is a debatable proposition. If you have not evidence, you should follow a valid logic. That’s it.
Nature is not a person! It is like laboratory with no experienced.
Hobotronic2037, I am not playing.
Waiting …
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 06:46 AM
|
#265
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,856
|
I think I'll wait for a coherent question.
Waiting...
Waiting...
...
...
...
Probably best to not expect one.
Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 07:21 AM
|
#266
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
I think you can't answer.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 07:31 AM
|
#267
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
Okay! Existing creator is also possible theoretically, however, existing creator more logical!
|
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Pony up, bitch. Your theory, your logic, everything.
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 09:26 AM
|
#268
|
Stinkin' Mod
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,616
|
Quote:
ahoba wrote
I think you can't answer.
|
Stop the Holy See men!
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 09:48 AM
|
#269
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Hobotronic2037 wrote
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Pony up, bitch. Your theory, your logic, everything.
|
"A computer program must be created by a person"
If this is extraordinary claim I will answer you
If I say you are a human being although I have never seen you, is this extraordinary claim?
Come on !
Best regards,
|
|
|
09-03-2015, 10:58 AM
|
#270
|
Stinkin' Mod
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 13,616
|
Stop the Holy See men!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 AM.
|