Old 11-11-2009, 06:49 PM   #1
nastassja
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Newspaper 9/11 and stuff

I like to see the world crashing around me.


It's an interesting watch.
nastassja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:34 PM   #2
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
Damnit, nastassja, please tell me you're not a troofer.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:37 PM   #3
nastassja
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Quote:
Professor Chaos wrote View Post
Damnit, nastassja, please tell me you're not a troofer.
I have no opinion on the matter. I just saw this movie today, though, and thought it was interesting enough to share.
nastassja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:41 PM   #4
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
Gotcha. It's an old video, and mostly full of steaming mounds of dung. It's been covered many times in many places, including here. A quick search pulls up this thread where teh conspiracies about 9/11 are brutally murdered, but there are others, too.

Researching the topic, watching the video, and asking questions are all good things. But once one weighs the evidence the troof becomes pretty clear.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:41 PM   #5
Node18
Senior Member
 
Node18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Freaking Zealand
Posts: 717
I found more interest in Zeitgeist.

I hear Bovina gives incredibly good blowjobs. What do you think Choobus?
anyone who can swallow the catholic turdology with such enthusiasm must have practically no gag reflex
Node18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:46 PM   #6
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
Quote:
Node18 wrote View Post
I found more interest in Zeitgeist.
That's like saying you found more interest in eating donkey shit than in eating goat shit.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 07:49 PM   #7
Node18
Senior Member
 
Node18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Freaking Zealand
Posts: 717
Pretty much. Both documentaries were shit, but I'd rather watch Zeitgeist many times over rather than Loose Change if forced to (meh). Zeitgeist had a good religion debunk section as well as an interesting Federal Reserve section, even though it's 9/11 conspiracy claims were shit. Though it was shit, it kept me awake long enough to swallow the shit and spit it back out. Loose Change just made me not want to swallow the shit all together.

I hear Bovina gives incredibly good blowjobs. What do you think Choobus?
anyone who can swallow the catholic turdology with such enthusiasm must have practically no gag reflex
Node18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 09:08 PM   #8
nastassja
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Quote:
Professor Chaos wrote View Post
Gotcha. It's an old video, and mostly full of steaming mounds of dung. It's been covered many times in many places, including here. A quick search pulls up this thread where teh conspiracies about 9/11 are brutally murdered, but there are others, too.

Researching the topic, watching the video, and asking questions are all good things. But once one weighs the evidence the troof becomes pretty clear.
The link you gave me makes the same points Loose Change does...? Well, at least about WT7 and the Bin Laden tape. I'll check out some of the links, but later.

Edit: I think Loose Change has some merit, not because of its conspiracy claims, but for at least challenging the official story while providing evidence. I never knew much about 9/11 from the start. It happened when I was pretty young and I wasn't even living in the US back then.
nastassja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 04:49 AM   #9
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
Quote:
nastassja wrote View Post
The link you gave me makes the same points Loose Change does...?
...and then a handful of forum members explain why those points are invalid and provide links to their sources. (It's a lengthy thread.) I should have been more clear there.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 05:16 AM   #10
just questions
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 550
This one?
just questions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 09:06 AM   #11
calpurnpiso
I Live Here
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chandler- Arizona
Posts: 14,227
Quote:
nastassja wrote View Post
What about the aliens of area 52 that advised secretary McNamarra & were responsible for the development of many technologies including the stealth bomber & when Kennedy decide to expose them, they invaded the brain of one Lee Harvey Oswald who killed him?

Christians and other folks infected with delusional beliefs think and reason like schizophrenics or temporal lobe epileptics. Their morality is dictated by an invisible friend called Jesus.
calpurnpiso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 09:18 AM   #12
VladTheImpaler
Obsessed Member
 
VladTheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
nastassja wrote View Post
It's an interesting watch.
Take a look at this nastassja:

9/11 Pentagon Attack - Eye Witness Reports

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~Epicurus
VladTheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 09:21 AM   #13
VladTheImpaler
Obsessed Member
 
VladTheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Professor Chaos wrote View Post
...and then a handful of forum members explain why those points are invalid and provide links to their sources. (It's a lengthy thread.) I should have been more clear there.
Not that simple and you know it.

So far, nothing is resolved in regards to 9/11 in regards to what actually happened. The only thing that has become increasingly clear is that the 9/11 commission report is filled with errors and direct lies.

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~Epicurus
VladTheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 09:25 AM   #14
VladTheImpaler
Obsessed Member
 
VladTheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Professor Chaos wrote View Post
Gotcha. It's an old video, and mostly full of steaming mounds of dung. It's been covered many times in many places, including here. A quick search pulls up this thread where teh conspiracies about 9/11 are brutally murdered, but there are others, too.
Of course PC is in denial when it comes to this topic and consequently unable to even consider that a false flag operation is a possibility. I would recommend that you don't (anyone reading) put much into what he's saying without investigating the issue your self.

His claim that everything has been covered and basically been straightened out is completely false. PC will no doubt continue to spew this line however.

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~Epicurus
VladTheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 11:10 AM   #15
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
Quote:
VladTheImpaler wrote View Post
Of course PC is in denial when it comes to this topic and consequently unable to even consider that a false flag operation is a possibility. I would recommend that you don't (anyone reading) put much into what he's saying without investigating the issue your self.

His claim that everything has been covered and basically been straightened out is completely false. PC will no doubt continue to spew this line however.
Sometimes I almost forget just how fucking stupid you are, Donna.

First, I just got done telling her to investigate the issue herself. You can read it more clearly or I can diagram out for you what this means:

Quote:
Professor Chaos wrote
Researching the topic, watching the video, and asking questions are all good things.
The point was for her to not be an idiot like you and watch what is evident to most bipedal hominids as complete horseshit without investigating the claims made.

Secondly my "claim that everything has been covered and basically been straightened out" is not a claim at all. There are unresolved questions, to be sure. But those unresolved questions do not include whether the twin towers were brought down by a controlled demolition and whether the Pentagon was blown up by Dick Cheney and Karl Rove and the Skull and Bones Society or whatever other happy horseshit you freaks believe.

The evidence is clear, and is provided by several people in the thread to which I linked earlier.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational