who jacks off the most? - Page 51

Tenspace · 03-09-2006, 03:39 PM

Quote:

schemanista wrote

Quote:

Tenspace wrote

for i = 1 to n
wank(eye_candy,spooge_receptacle)
i++
next

Choobus, if you don't define n, then there's no upper boundary! YOU CAN'T STOP WANKING!

Is that pseudocode supposed to be c? If so, no problem. A memory leak is going to crash your program anyway. The Choobster will have to reboot, re-wank, recycle.

No, it's just pseudocode. I just like the elegance of C's increment operator over (i=i+1).

Eva · 03-09-2006, 09:12 PM

please, speak in a language known to humans.

thank you, sirs and/or ladies.

03-11-2006, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Eva wrote

please, speak in a language known to humans.

thank you, sirs and/or ladies.

so polite

Choobus · 03-11-2006, 07:02 PM

Eva may be polite, but if you cross her she'll shove a cucumber so far uo your arse you'll gag like a deepthroating amateur.

that's what I heard anyway.

03-11-2006, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Choobus wrote

Eva may be polite, but if you cross her she'll shove a cucumber so far uo your arse you'll gag like a deepthroating amateur.

that's what I heard anyway.

How do you know that?

Choobus · 03-11-2006, 09:01 PM

it's just the word on the street......

Eva · 03-11-2006, 10:35 PM

mc, he knows from (painful) experience.
that's why he is a good boy now.

Choobus · 03-11-2006, 10:36 PM

cucumber sandwich anyone???

Choobus · 03-14-2006, 06:59 PM

you wankers are slacking off.

Is there anything in the bible about wanking? Did Adam perhaps invent wanking, but then got bored and went for a rib trade in? Is wanking considered sinful even if you don't wank off to fantasies about giving Mary Magdalene a pearl necklace?

03-14-2006, 07:32 PM

Now that you mention it, no there isn't. The Christian opposition to jerking off comes from a misinterpretation of the story of Onan and Tamar in Genesis 38. The ancient Hebrews had a custom known as levirate marriage (levirate meaning "brother-in-law"). Basically if a man died before fathering a male heir, his brother would be required to sleep with the widow until she conceived a son. The child would be considered the legal offspring of the dead husband, and therefore inherit his estate.

So basically Onan realized this and pulled out before getting Tamar pregnant. God got angry and killed him for it. (For a good laugh, read the rest of Genesis to find out how Tamar eventually DID get pregnant.)

The custom is described in greater detail in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, only by that point it does not call for the death of the brother if he refuses.

03-14-2006, 08:50 PM

My zeus, this has got to be the longest thread I've ever posted in. Hey choobus, maybe you should add a wikipedia page where it will define the term "do you do anal" as question commonly used to piss off theists. Ever think of that?

Choobus · 03-15-2006, 03:48 PM

Quote:

JC Senton wrote

My zeus, this has got to be the longest thread I've ever posted in. Hey choobus, maybe you should add a wikipedia page where it will define the term "do you do anal" as question commonly used to piss off theists. Ever think of that?

but what happens whern you want to find out if a theist does anal? They will naturally assume you are taking the piss..........

03-15-2006, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Silentknight wrote

Now that you mention it, no there isn't. The Christian opposition to jerking off comes from a misinterpretation of the story of Onan and Tamar in Genesis 38. The ancient Hebrews had a custom known as levirate marriage (levirate meaning "brother-in-law"). Basically if a man died before fathering a male heir, his brother would be required to sleep with the widow until she conceived a son. The child would be considered the legal offspring of the dead husband, and therefore inherit his estate.

So basically Onan realized this and pulled out before getting Tamar pregnant. God got angry and killed him for it. (For a good laugh, read the rest of Genesis to find out how Tamar eventually DID get pregnant.)

The custom is described in greater detail in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, only by that point it does not call for the death of the brother if he refuses.

I have a little difficulty understanding why he would pull out. It has been a long time since I looked into the buybull, but seems to me that even if she were a screaming mutt, he'd blow a load IN her, rather than spooging her buns, since he's already boinkin' 'er.

03-15-2006, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Silentknight wrote

Now that you mention it, no there isn't. The Christian opposition to jerking off comes from a misinterpretation of the story of Onan and Tamar in Genesis 38. The ancient Hebrews had a custom known as levirate marriage (levirate meaning "brother-in-law"). Basically if a man died before fathering a male heir, his brother would be required to sleep with the widow until she conceived a son. The child would be considered the legal offspring of the dead husband, and therefore inherit his estate.

So basically Onan realized this and pulled out before getting Tamar pregnant. God got angry and killed him for it. (For a good laugh, read the rest of Genesis to find out how Tamar eventually DID get pregnant.)

The custom is described in greater detail in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, only by that point it does not call for the death of the brother if he refuses.

I have a little difficulty understanding why he would pull out. It has been a long time since I looked into the buybull, but seems to me that even if she were a screaming mutt, he'd blow a load IN her, rather than spooging her buns, since he's already boinkin' 'er.

Choobus · 03-15-2006, 04:45 PM

maybe he didn't want any bastard children, or maybe he was hoping to inherit his dead brothers shit, which he wouldn't if the wife had a son. Or maybe he has just read too many porno scrolls and couldn't resist giving her a pearl necklace.....