01-03-2013, 01:22 AM
|
#16
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
ghoulslime wrote
It had to be 50% an act of the gods!
The world shall mourn the loss of Jerry50/50's wisdom!
|
Nah just incompetence by someone who shouldn't have admin permissions.
All you need to do to get rid of me is rationalise your perspective.
Depending on the lack of evidence equates to a lack of belief in a cause for existence as well. Tell me why your position holds any relevance at all and why it requires you to be actively involved in having a lack of belief in other people's position(s).
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 03:58 AM
|
#17
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
|
Quote:
selliedjoup wrote
What mean asking you to rationalise why evidence must be coming, and you focusing on my claim of 50/50?
Are you able to rationalise it beyond the obvious "we need evidence to know something"?
|
Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.
A theist is just an atheist with a space in it.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 04:24 AM
|
#18
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Great Ocean Road
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
selliedjoup wrote
What mean asking you to rationalise why evidence must be coming, and you focusing on my claim of 50/50?
Are you able to rationalise it beyond the obvious "we need evidence to know something"?
|
Yes, obvious. I wonder why?
Also obvious is how retarded your probability is for a superstitious origin for reality and existence. Superstition is what you get when you make up shit without evidence and then abandon incredulity to sustain your belief. The fact that evidence may not be forthcoming does not logically give rise to improved probabilities for anything the imagination may come up with in order to fill gaps.
Have you any evidence that the concept of creator gods have ever been anything other than a superstitious invention?
Once you are dead, you are nothing. Graffito, Pompeii
Last edited by Kinich Ahau; 01-03-2013 at 04:45 AM.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 07:15 AM
|
#19
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
|
Quote:
Kinich Ahau wrote
Yes, obvious. I wonder why?
Also obvious is how retarded your probability is for a superstitious origin for reality and existence. Superstition is what you get when you make up shit without evidence and then abandon incredulity to sustain your belief. The fact that evidence may not be forthcoming does not logically give rise to improved probabilities for anything the imagination may come up with in order to fill gaps.
Have you any evidence that the concept of creator gods have ever been anything other than a superstitious invention?
|
You are so silly. Creator now means anything that created the universe. Including random events, or eternally existing. I make that 100% of things are now "creator", including arse turtles.
A theist is just an atheist with a space in it.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 10:38 AM
|
#20
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 20,925
|
Quote:
selliedjoup wrote
Nah just incompetence by someone who shouldn't have admin permissions.
All you need to do to get rid of me is rationalise your perspective.
Depending on the lack of evidence equates to a lack of belief in a cause for existence as well. Tell me why your position holds any relevance at all and why it requires you to be actively involved in having a lack of belief in other people's position(s).
|
Lunatic!
The Leprechauns do not forbid the drawing of Their images, as long as we color within the lines. ~ Ghoulslime H Christ, Prophet, Seer, Revelator, and Masturbator
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 10:39 AM
|
#21
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 20,925
|
Quote:
ILOVEJESUS wrote
Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.
|
The Leprechauns do not forbid the drawing of Their images, as long as we color within the lines. ~ Ghoulslime H Christ, Prophet, Seer, Revelator, and Masturbator
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 11:12 AM
|
#22
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Why would this fool think that anybody would be alarmed by the loss of his thread? I hope it stays lost.
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 11:25 AM
|
#23
|
He who walks among the theists
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Big D
Posts: 12,119
|
Quote:
selliedjoup wrote
No.
No.
I don't see any reason to doubt that he existed, nor inspired and taught a philosophy to live by, but I don't believe Jesus was a prophet.
|
Dirty fucking atheist!
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one."
George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 11:42 AM
|
#24
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
|
Quote:
nkb wrote
Dirty fucking atheist!
|
You are so silly. He doesn't believe in God, but believes in the right for there to be a god.
A theist is just an atheist with a space in it.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 11:55 AM
|
#25
|
I Live Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Around the way
Posts: 12,641
|
Quote:
ILOVEJESUS wrote
You are so silly. He doesn't believe in God, but believes in the right for there to be a god.
|
Jerry doesn't believe in "God?" That sounds like atheism to me.
"So many gods, so many creeds! So many paths that wind and wind, when just the art of being kind is all this sad world needs."
--Ella Wheeler Wilcox
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:04 PM
|
#26
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
ILOVEJESUS wrote
Lol, now WE are focusing on the 50 50. Finally realised that it is a lost argument eh? Why should evidence be coming? So that you know it fucking exists you speculating fuckwit.
|
If you ask what I believe the probability is, and you then go over and over the same thing for a few years then there's no where else to go, unless you haven't pegged that this has been going on.
Sadly your poor rebuttals still leave the best guess anyone can have at 50/50.
Oh so evidence should be coming so we know it exists? So it's not coming if it doesn't exist?
Tell me, how do you know we can assess everything that exists?
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:06 PM
|
#27
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
selliedjoup wrote
my thread is gone.
|
Tell me it ain't so!
The best thread, ever on the Internet?! Gone?
That's OK, I'm sure you will have more than enough chances to demonstrate your stupidity all over again.
Quote:
Depending on the lack of evidence equates to a lack of belief in a cause for existence as well. Tell me why your position holds any relevance at all and why it requires you to be actively involved in having a lack of belief in other people's position(s)
|
See? It didn't take very long at all.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:15 PM
|
#28
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Kinich Ahau wrote
Yes, obvious. I wonder why?
Also obvious is how retarded your probability is for a superstitious origin for reality and existence. Superstition is what you get when you make up shit without evidence and then abandon incredulity to sustain your belief. The fact that evidence may not be forthcoming does not logically give rise to improved probabilities for anything the imagination may come up with in order to fill gaps.
Have you any evidence that the concept of creator gods have ever been anything other than a superstitious invention?
|
That you personally dislike religion and believe the concept of a creator to be superstitious based on the past says so much about who you think you are. By making this statement you imply we're on the edge of a great discovery in the rational age.
The fact that evidence may not be forthcoming would suggest not to base your disbelief on it.
There's no evidence for any cause, be it random or created.
The god of the gaps is as plausible as no god of the gaps , without any form of explanation both are as speculative as the other.
Why do you think that as a creation within existence, we would be able to assess everything in existence as it is? Why do you expect a deities fingerprint to be left on the higgs boson?
Of the evidence we have, tell me what points to or away from a random cause or creator. Which of this suggest to you that more evidence is coming to prove something to be true?
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:16 PM
|
#29
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
ILOVEJESUS wrote
You are so silly. Creator now means anything that created the universe. Including random events, or eternally existing. I make that 100% of things are now "creator", including arse turtles.
|
No wrong...again.
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:17 PM
|
#30
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Irreligious wrote
Why would this fool think that anybody would be alarmed by the loss of his thread? I hope it stays lost.
|
You're not very good at reading people are you?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29 PM.
|