Intellignet design and some of it's arguments - Page 2

Choobus · 09-24-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

HeathenLifer wrote

"That pencil may look red, but you can't say how it got red. Therfore, its an elephant."

if then it would not mean anything like that I could not or perhaps should but don't agree more.

09-25-2006, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Kate wrote

Don't you mean "Absolut Reinforcement"?
http://absolut.pinknet.cz/news/data/...redfamily_.jpg

YUM! I want the second one from the far right!

09-25-2006, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Choobus wrote

Quote:

HeathenLifer wrote

"That pencil may look red, but you can't say how it got red. Therfore, its an elephant."

if then it would not mean anything like that I could not or perhaps should but don't agree more.

Now, THAT is painfully twisted.

nkb · 09-26-2006, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Metman07 wrote

Quote:

Baphomet wrote

Quote:

Metman07 wrote

We wouldn't need to eat anything if God really did design the universe and all life. If he created the universe, he must be capable of creating energy and matter. Rather than having lifeforms feed on each other, he could have just created all organisms such that they have an unlimited supply of energy and matter to fulfill their requirements.

Yeah we all could have fed off sunlight or something.

Or better still, we could have an internal supply of energy and matter, thereby eliminating the need to procure these from outside sources.

Like a human nuclear submarine. How cool!