God is real

And maybe I'm not. If I am, so was Otto Schindewolf, Pierre Grasse, Richard B. Goldschmidt, William Bateson, Leo Berg and Robert Broom, six of the greatest biologists of the post Darwinian era.

[ghoulslime]

Tenspace wrote

Why don't you sharpen your knife, dickweed, and take a stab at my questions?

Alternatively, you could just admit that you don't know enough about statistical observations at the population level to coherently formulate a theory.

Yeah, Doctor Dolt, dig your fangs into some real meat instead of spewing your diaper gravy all over the place.

[ghoulslime]

John A. Davison wrote

And maybe I'm not. If I am, so was Otto Schindewolf, Pierre Grasse, Richard B. Goldschmidt, William Bateson, Leo Berg and Robert Broom, six of the greatest biologists of the post Darwinian era.

But maybe you ARE crazy.

How do you know you are not crazy?

If you've never wondered if you might be crazy, chances are really good that, indeed, you are as crazy as a Britney Spears on a bottle of gin.

[Irreligious]

Dr. Davison, shouldn't you be publishing your work in peer-reviewed journals instead of fucking around here?

I mean, it seems such a waste if you think you have actually discovered God or gods (living or dead) in the intricately minute details of existence. You certainly haven't convinced any of the scientifically literate folks here and it seems unlikely that you will. Why not cut your losses and present your findings to the scientific community at-large?

At least there, there's a chance you might get paid for your efforts.

[ghoulslime]

Doctor John, let me ask you an easy question, since the hard ones seem to put a crinkle in your tidy tight white underpants.

Do you think there is a possibility that you might be wrong?

[Choobus]

Tenspace wrote

Dr Analson seems to be quite similar to Witt as it happens. (http://web.mit.edu/~bmonreal/www/Nul...cs_Review.html is an amusing review of Witts witless theory). MAybe they are related, or maybe they are just douche-brothers. I can imagine Witt being laughed out of a university and then proudly asking "Who is next? I love it so.".

Im not on trial here Ghoulslime. You and all your "groupthinking" cronies are. Probablity and statistics also had absolutely NOTHING to do with creative evolution, a phenomenon of the distant past.

It doesn't get any better than this.

Who is next to be butchered?

I love it so!

[ghoulslime]

Irreligious wrote

Dr. Davison, shouldn't you be publishing your work in peer-reviewed journals instead of fucking around here?

I mean, it seems such a waste if you think you have actually discovered God or gods (living or dead) in the intricately minute details of existence. You certainly haven't convinced any of the scientifically literate folks here and it seems unlikely that you will. Why not cut your losses and present your findings to the scientific community at-large?

At least there, there's a chance you might get paid for your efforts.

That's right! Why give the milk away for free when you can sell the whole cow!

[Irreligious]

John A. Davison wrote

Im not on trial here Ghoulslime. You and all your "groupthinking" cronies are. Probablity and statistics also had absolutely NOTHING to do with creative evolution, a phenomenon of the distant past.

It doesn't get any better than this.

Who is next to be butchered?

I love it so!

We're not on trial, either. But you are an interloper with zero credibility here, hurling insults that no one takes seriously. What's the point?

[Choobus]

[ghoulslime]

John A. Davison wrote

Im not on trial here Ghoulslime. You and all your "groupthinking" cronies are. Probablity and statistics also had absolutely NOTHING to do with creative evolution, a phenomenon of the distant past.

It doesn't get any better than this.

Who is next to be butchered?

I love it so!

You seem to be a poor judge of who the judge is if you deem yourself such.

You are downright silly, hiding in you little dogmatic bunker, too afraid to even answer our questions. What a laughable buffoon you turned out to be!

The only thing you have butchered is your standing in the eyes of objective thinkers.

[dogpet]

Irreligious wrote

Dr. Davison, shouldn't you be publishing your work in peer-reviewed journals instead of fucking around here?

He would need a fucking patient proof reader or two too to decipher it.

[Choobus]

dogpet wrote

He would need a fucking patient proof reader or two too to decipher it.

yeah, and a retarded editor to send it out to review, and some uneducated referees to accept it (I wish I could say that this never happens, but I can't).

[Philboid Studge]

There are several members in here who do science better than Doc Diggler. There's at least one non-scientist -- Tenspace -- who understands evolutionary theory better. I think even I know more about Roman Catholicism than this angry old gent. If you think about it, I bet Cal could give him a run for his money on how to be a proper crackpot. So what are you bringing to the table, Doc? Old man smell? I got that too.

[ghoulslime]