Hey, look at this little gem!!!

Don't you wish we could round up invading Xtians with disco lights?

[Sternwallow]

4thgeneration wrote

Don't you wish we could round up invading Xtians with disco lights?

They seem to gravitate toward burning incense and lamb flesh. Whole herds can be collected at rituals called Church Suppers. You can also spread nets near Reproductive Care clinics.

evident_enigma wrote

Well, any takers or are all you ID/C people just admit that you're wrong?

Macro evolution happens whether:

You like it or not (for whatever reason).
It destroys your sense of hope or not (for whatever reason).
You are told the truth about it or not (for whatever reason).

Or whether you just like luxury or not (for whatever reason). :)

As time goes by, humans will see more and more examples of evolution whether it is popular or not (for whatever reason). :lol:

ee

Ok fine, since none of the propagandists have commented, you lose yet another one in a series of on-going intellectual defeats, ID/Cs.
ee

Here's some more stuff:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12583046/

This link was in the article, but I thought it would be best to go ahead and post it, anyway.

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiol...2_ID_main.html

Have fun.


E_E

Actually those toads grew longer legs because they were REACHING FOR THE LAWD!!!

(yall couldn't find a creationist for this one, so I'll do it, just for today)

PLUS, the law of thermodynamics PROVES that those toad legs aren't acually longer, but god has in fact tilted the earth, so that stuff down on one side looks bigger. The bible says so.

ON TOP OF THAT, what about the Ica stones, huh? Clearly those toads are all 4000 years old (not the species, but EACH TOAD), and lived with dinosaurs.

IN ADDITION, if there is no god, why did they find a viable toad in the bone of a T-REX? HUH? EXPLAIN THAT!!!

NOT TO MENTION that just because there is "data" of "people" taking "measurements" of "toad legs" 20 years ago, that sure as hell doesn't mean that these "measurements" were correct. What if the ruler was travelling close to the speed of light when it took the measurement? It would be smaller, according to Einstein, WHO BELIEVED IN GOD!

I want to see one of these toads, you atheist bastards are probably doing bone-lengthening surgery on them!

(end spat as token creationist)

[Sternwallow]

But Los, we didn't need any creationists!

Sternwallow wrote

But Los, we didn't need any creationists!

Oh well, it was still fun!:)

[Sternwallow]

Los Pepes wrote

Oh well, it was still fun!:)

;) ;)

Los Pepes wrote

Actually those toads grew longer legs because they were REACHING FOR THE LAWD!!!

(yall couldn't find a creationist for this one, so I'll do it, just for today)

PLUS, the law of thermodynamics PROVES that those toad legs aren't acually longer, but god has in fact tilted the earth, so that stuff down on one side looks bigger. The bible says so.

ON TOP OF THAT, what about the Ica stones, huh? Clearly those toads are all 4000 years old (not the species, but EACH TOAD), and lived with dinosaurs.

IN ADDITION, if there is no god, why did they find a viable toad in the bone of a T-REX? HUH? EXPLAIN THAT!!!

NOT TO MENTION that just because there is "data" of "people" taking "measurements" of "toad legs" 20 years ago, that sure as hell doesn't mean that these "measurements" were correct. What if the ruler was travelling close to the speed of light when it took the measurement? It would be smaller, according to Einstein, WHO BELIEVED IN GOD!

I want to see one of these toads, you atheist bastards are probably doing bone-lengthening surgery on them!

(end spat as token creationist)

Thanks los pepes for stepping in where creationists are afraid to.

No creationists seem to want to comment on this, I wonder why.....

Oh yeah, they'll get their arses handed to them in debate, as usual.

Next thing ya know, they'll move up their particular view of "microevolution" to include frogs and maybe something as large as a house cat.

It just seems to pass their radar that frogs are multicellular, like insects.

I can't fathom why they say things so stupid as:

"Macro evolution doesn't happen."

Just because we don't see it IMMEDIATELY in humans.

They just have trouble with time scale comprehension and reproduction rates. Microbes reproduce thousands of times faster than humans even at a minimum consideration of reproductive age for humans.

Humans also have a history of suppressing mutations and population deviators.

For example:
Like euthanasia (spelling?) in WWII germany for the mentally handicapped.

In closing:
Not only do we have "issues" with genetic variation as a species, but our reproductive rates are much lower than that of other organisms that show evolution.

my two cents, at least
E_E