Plenty of reason to believe in a higher power

[Andrew66]

Kinich Ahau wrote

Complete logic fail once again by AndyIQ27.

IQ 1027 not bad, I liked 1033 better

[Smellyoldgit]

Andrew66 wrote

How does the guy Know

"The fingerprints of the eternal laws of nature" that the laws of nature are eternal???

Why Smelly do you accept conjecture when it supports Atheism but not Theism?

Hypocrite.

As expected, you didn't read the article. No surprise.

[hertz vanrental]

Smellyoldgit wrote

As expected, you didn't read the article. No surprise.

IQ 6 can't write, ffs, so why do you expect the dense twat to be able to read?

[Smellyoldgit]

Android & his ilk can't get it into their dense heads that natural laws (including time) beautifully explain everything we currently know about the universe - and their super being, higher power or gods are a redundant sack of horseshit. They have to try and cram their god's fat ass into the ever decreasing gaps where our knowledge is incomplete. Twats.

[hertz vanrental]

Smellyoldgit wrote

Android & his ilk can't get it into their dense heads that natural laws (including time) beautifully explain everything we currently know about the universe - and their super being, higher power or gods are a redundant sack of horseshit. They have to try and cram their god's fat ass into the ever decreasing gaps where our knowledge is incomplete. Twats.

It gets worse.

Atheists proclaim that their lack of belief in god is provisional until such time as proof emerges one way or the other. We contend that, as things currently stand, christardology has failed to meet its burden of proof. However, if it does meet it burden, then, we all convert. It would be the only logical way forward.

On the other hand, christards have nailed their asses to the cross as it were. They have declared their belief in de lard and zombie boy. To retract their belief and go Atheist, they have to eat one big pile of shit, especially senile old mary and twat licker android IQ 6. Methinks that isn't going to happen any day soon. It would represent too much of a climb-down and the amount of shit would, I think, prove too much, even for them.

Regardless of what they read, it isn't going to make any difference. They will still believe in lard ass and zombie boy. This is what is referred to as 'brain washing'.

[Simon Moon]

hertz vanrental wrote

It gets worse.

Atheists proclaim that their lack of belief in god is provisional until such time as proof emerges one way or the other. We contend that, as things currently stand, christardology has failed to meet its burden of proof. However, if it does meet it burden, then, we all convert. It would be the only logical way forward.

On the other hand, christards have nailed their asses to the cross as it were. They have declared their belief in de lard and zombie boy. To retract their belief and go Atheist, they have to eat one big pile of shit, especially senile old mary and twat licker android IQ 6. Methinks that isn't going to happen any day soon. It would represent too much of a climb-down and the amount of shit would, I think, prove too much, even for them.

Regardless of what they read, it isn't going to make any difference. They will still believe in lard ass and zombie boy. This is what is referred to as 'brain washing'.

Agree with everything, except the part I bolded above.

Even if the case for the existence of the Christian god did meet its burden of proof, that does not mean I would convert. I would be convinced the Bible god exists, but converting to Christianity is something else entirely.

If the Bible (OT and NT) accurately describe the god's nature and actions, I would not want anything to do with that god. That god is an immoral thug.

Any god that condones slavery, orders the slaughter of entire towns (except for the virgins), requires a blood sacrifice to act as a loophole in his own rules, condones the subjugation of women, etc, does not deserve worship, or even respect.

Of course, he could crush me like a bug, but I'd go knowing that I was more moral than said god.

[hertz vanrental]

Simon Moon wrote

Agree with everything, except the part I bolded above.

Even if the case for the existence of the Christian god did meet its burden of proof, that does not mean I would convert. I would be convinced the Bible god exists, but converting to Christianity is something else entirely.

If the Bible (OT and NT) accurately describe the god's nature and actions, I would not want anything to do with that god. That god is an immoral thug.

Any god that condones slavery, orders the slaughter of entire towns (except for the virgins), requires a blood sacrifice to act as a loophole in his own rules, condones the subjugation of women, etc, does not deserve worship, or even respect.

Of course, he could crush me like a bug, but I'd go knowing that I was more moral than said god.

I was thinking more along the lines of true Christianity, rather than the bollocks in the babble.

[Andrew66]

hertz vanrental wrote

I was thinking more along the lines of true Christianity, rather than the bollocks in the babble.

Thats right, thanks Hertz

God is Good.