Quote Page

[Tenspace]

SchrackTheBaptist wrote

We also have to remember that "dinosaurs" were to ancient people like modern animals are to us. There was no peculiar fascination with them such as we have because they lived among them while we have not.

[Tenspace]

Snapcrafter wrote

No... it's about a talking donkey. I agree, some animals have some pretty wacky abilities. Some can fly, others do have this biochemical luminescence. But a donkey doesn't talk.

"debating" with you is like trying to explain to a dog why he has to shit outside. In the end the only thing to do is shove his face in the shit and kick him out. The main difference is that eventually the dog will get it, while you are content to live your life with shit allover your face.

~Choobus~

ShadowWolf1 wrote

I am not well learned on the subject of Physics, so I only know what I have observed myself and the little that I have read about the subject. But what is your specific objection to my "arbitrary application of physical laws" sir?

From here.

[Choobus]

jiminy cricket wrote

I don't get things from peer-reviewed journals. I actually think for myself. Have you ever thought that I might have thought up this argument?

[Choobus]

Ghoulslime wrote

I remember once at scout camp, he beat his meat so much that he irritated his urethra until he was bleeding out of his dick. He came crying to the other boys, because he didn’t want the adults to find out.

[Choobus]

Gathercole wrote

I have a friend like Lily. He divides religious people into two categories: the masses and the "adepts". The masses have always been and always will be stupid. They will take the Bible literally, as most Christians in the US do. They will believe gays will go to Hell. They will believe a rib-woman was out-smarted by a talking snake.

Choobus wrote

Maybe I was wrong about the whole thing. Maybe the christian church is not merely the twisted legacy of a cynical attempt tp consoliddate power over an ignorant populace. Perhaps the Bible is a coherrant collection of instructions inspired by God and not just an arbitrary collection of stories. Maybe Jesus did die for our sins, but then didn't die really, but it still counts for some reason. Perhaps god really does hate the fags he created.

[Philboid Studge]

joni, channeling carico, wrote

That's right. God's existence is proven because if he didn't exist I would be sad. :(
Also, it says so in an ancient book that I have never read.
Oh, and the second law of thermodynamics makes evolution impossible! It's so obvious and yet real scientists haven't noticed. Stupid scientists. :cool:

Jesus loves you.

Where have all the theists gone?

[Gnosital]

Choobus wrote

I would like to set the record straight regarding an accusation thaty has been made ot me on more than one occasion; namely that I "resort to ad hominim attacks" on theists instead of debating them. This is simply not true. I never resort to ad hominim attacks instead of debating. My policy when talking to most godidiots is to skip debating altogether and go straight to the ad hominim attacks. I see no reason to waste precious time that could be used for enjoying porn debating with peorple who, almost by definition, cannot be educated. Theists would go into a mental breakdown if they actually allowed themselves to think rationally about their absurd beliefs, and so they have a highly effective internal censor that prevents them from correctly understanding anything that conflicts with their faith. It is only through years and years of attrition that theists can break free of the mental prison in which they languish, and even though the wisdom of choobus is indeed awesome to behold, these fucktards are unable to take it in, just as they are unable to take in any non-cheebus approved information. Thus, debating with them is as pointless as trying to direct the tiny actors who live in your TV. Sometimes there are theists who are worth talking to (Steve G is the usual example of this) but for themost part this is not the case. Carico is a good example of how much sheer stupidity can be associated with Christlove. I would rather eat my own excrement than try to have a conversation with Carico. It would be preferable for small midgets to poke my nether regions with pointy sticks than to speak at length with Thomas. A chat with Binyamin is as appealing to me as snack made entirely from uncooked dog entrails.

Thus, I say to you theists, you are not fit to blow dry the hairs on my ballsack; any communication you recieve from me is as manna from heaven to godidiots such as yourselves, and the most appropriate response would be for you to write to your mother and tell her, "behold, Choobus does honour me most highly".

in: http://ravingatheist.com/forum/viewt...hp?id=3305&p=6

P. Dunn wrote

I believe in a literal, non-global flood. What I've found though is that most of the objections to the flood story all assume that things are the same as they were back then...There were millions of different species then, so how could they all fit on the ark? Mountains were that tall back then too, so how was the water higher? These are bad assumptions, because we know that mountains weren't that tall since we find sea fossils on the tops of the tallest ones, and we know that natural selection has caused a huge increase in species numbers. (Not macroevolution...natural selection, microevolution).

[Choobus]

Lilyy wrote

I have very little patience with self-inflicted blindness.

[Choobus]

Eva wrote

shit ipsa loquitur!

Salty wrote

Speciation?! You've got to be kidding! Of course, I guess you have to go to such extremes to give people "evidence" for your hypothesis. I agree speciation occurs. But the genetic variability to do that is already in the animal.

Edit: In case no one remembers the context, this is Salty using evolution to prove that evoultion is false.

At the next Shitlord ceremony, I propose that he gets a lifetime achievement award.

[Choobus]

Ghoulslime wrote

I'd rather get fucked in the ass than in the mind.