Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2012, 05:11 AM   #181
Kinich Ahau
Obsessed Member
 
Kinich Ahau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Great Ocean Road
Posts: 2,455
Egor probably thinks he is the nurse but in reality he is the patient. You never know with deluded fucks like EGOr.

Once you are dead, you are nothing. Graffito, Pompeii
Kinich Ahau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 05:24 AM   #182
Stargazer
Obsessed Member
 
Stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,727
Quote:
Egor wrote View Post

We already went there, remember? I told you how to take a picture of God.
This is not proof of any kind. This is something theists often do in response to this question however. Instead of offering any solid, substantial proof, they tell me I need to stand slack jawed in awe of how complicated life is and somehow conclude that because things are beautiful/complex/there at all that there MUST be a god.

If offered this kind of "proof" in, say, the medical field, you would immediately dismiss it as ridiculous. So why the intellectual disconnect when it comes to God?

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
You bet. A little neologism on my part. ďVeridicanismĒ coined in 1993.

Veridical = True

-an = suffix denoting a follower

-ism = suffix denoting a doctrine

Veridicanism = The doctrine of those who follow that which is true.

What is true is this:

1. God is monistic in His nature.

2. The human purpose is to be Christ. Christ is God conscious of Himself from within His creation.
This is great and all that, and at least shows that you have something of an imagination, but you are still a theist, and still using all the same basic arguments that they all are. The fact that you apparently could not find a fit in the existing religions and made up your own, however, seems to indicate some kind of deep seated unease with theism, and, I wonder, if you had carried that feeling further is you might have joined the ranks of atheists. To which we would welcome you, by the way.

However, your choice, of course.

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
You sure were working at the mystery of it.
It is my nature to be thorough. I attack everything that way.

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
Why do girls always decry testosterone? When theyíre afraid of the dark they want as much of it around as possible.
While I see the attempt to stereotype me, I will say this:

I am not afraid of the dark. Or the things that lurk in it.

I thought you said you didn't care what any of us thought? So, you do care? I do wish you would make up your mind already. - NKB

Last edited by Stargazer; 02-06-2012 at 05:46 AM. Reason: Punctuation
Stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 07:18 AM   #183
orangeitis
Member
 
orangeitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Galloway, Ohio
Posts: 177
Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
What is true is this:

1. God is monistic in His nature.

2. The human purpose is to be Christ. Christ is God conscious of Himself from within His creation.
That's a mighty set of claims. Do you have empirical evidence prepared to support them?

Christians! Want to convert some atheists? read this!
orangeitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 07:40 AM   #184
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 12,961
Quote:
orangeitis wrote View Post
That's a mighty set of claims. Do you have empirical evidence prepared to support them?
Why yes, I believe he does:


Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 08:21 AM   #185
ILOVEJESUS
I Live Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,158
Quote:
orangeitis wrote View Post
That's a mighty set of claims. Do you have empirical evidence prepared to support them?
He has already admitted to having made this religion up has he not?
ILOVEJESUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 08:24 AM   #186
Eternal
Thank God Iím an atheist
 
Eternal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Little Britain
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
orangeitis wrote View Post
That's a mighty set of claims. Do you have empirical evidence prepared to support them?
Even more baffling is how he can claim God is monistic, when he can't even provide a clear, concise definition of God.

"Belief means not wanting to know what is true"
Friedrich Nietzsche
Eternal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:32 AM   #187
Egor
Member
 
Egor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Quote:
Irreligious wrote View Post
Wait a minute. You reserve the right to reject and disdain other people's beliefs but they are, somehow, bound to respect yours?


I donít disdain anyoneís religion. Have you heard me do that? In fact, Iíve defended others religions by claiming they are worshiping the same God I am, just a different revelation of him.

But it's the doctrine of just one person, the only known Veridican on the planet: You.

Yep. In fact, Iím at a crossroads right now. I have tried in the past to be a traditional Christian, but I have failed each time. This time around, itís as if God has tricked me back into being a Veridican. I have tried to leave it behind, but I canít seem to do it. So, I guess itís my purpose in life to go forward with it.

I have never written down a concise and definite version of Veridicanism, except for the two tenets (God is monistic in nature, and the human purpose is to be Christ.). But where Iím at in my book right now necessitates it. I have been trying to let this cup pass from me, but it wonít go away.

The crossroads is this: I believe everyone should form their own religion from reading the Gospels (that is, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and also Thomas). Everyone should walk their own path. There shouldnít be 35,000 denominations of Christianity; there should be 6 billion denominations. But I also realize that can be like feeding an infant by setting a can of chili in front of him or her along with a can opener. So I may have to set out a system of belief whether I want to or not.

But I fully expect to be the only Veridican until the day I die. What happens with it after that or how it is forgotten, or worse corrupted, will not be my concern. Apparently, I was born to invent this religion, so I need to get about the business of it. Itís been in formation for the last 19 years. Thereís nothing left to discover. Itís just time to do.

Quote:
Why on earth would you seek to assault 7 billion people with it?

To save them from Hell, of course.



Quote:
Stargazer wrote View Post
This is not proof of any kind. This is something theists often do in response to this question however. Instead of offering any solid, substantial proof, they tell me I need to stand slack jawed in awe of how complicated life is and somehow conclude that because things are beautiful/complex/there at all that there MUST be a god.


I donít know what you mean by ďSolid, substantial proof.Ē If you want to see God physically, then you have to look at his physical body, and that is the universe. If you want to connect with God spiritually, then you have to grow closer to him by living out your purpose, which is to become His consciousness within His creation. You donít meet God; you wake up to God. If you want to feel Godís love for you, then you must be willing to be one with God.

Quote:
If offered this kind of "proof" in, say, the medical field, you would immediately dismiss it as ridiculous. So why the intellectual disconnect when it comes to God?

I wouldnít even go there. The medical field is not dominated by atheism. Far, far from it. I have never met an atheist nurse that I know of. All of them have been quite spiritually-minded. Most doctors, Iíve met, quite frankly, are Hindu. My Anatomy and Physiology professor was the one who said, ďIf youíre not a believer when you start this class; you will be when you finish.Ē Meaning that the complexity and design of the human body was enough to make anyone believe in God.

Evidence-based care is what nurses are supposed to go by, and we do. In other words, what has been proven to work, we use. Thatís why in psychiatry, we assess patients for religious beliefs, because solid religious beliefs can be an asset in their healing. Hyper-religiosity, which is a sign of delusion and psychosis, is not the same thing as true religious belief. There is a huge difference between a patient being able to focus on reading the Bible and a patient who walks around with a Bible to ward off demons.

I know that from the outside, it seems that medicine is this great atheistic research laboratory where people are healed with all the confidence of science, but in truth itís not that way. There are medicines that work on infections, pain, tumor growth, and the positive symptoms of mental illness. There are procedures you can do to fix the body when it is broke, but people heal on their own. You stich a laceration together, and God takes it from there. You inject epinephrine and atropine and do chest compressions and ventilate a dying man, maybe you apply an electric shock to the heart, but none of that makes a person live. Most people in cardiac arrest will still die.

No one would ever suggest that medicine should be scrapped and faith healing should ensue. God has given us our technological advancement. But there is the illusion of medical science and there is the clinical reality of what it can do. Thatís why a lot of people prefer nursing over being a physician. Some of us believe that caring for a patient never fails, whereas medicine, in the long run, always failsówe all die.

Quote:
This is great and all that, and at least shows that you have something of an imagination, but you are still a theist, and still using all the same basic arguments that they all are. The fact that you apparently could not find a fit in the existing religions and made up your own, however, seems to indicate some kind of deep seated unease with theism, and, I wonder, if you had carried that feeling further is you might have joined the ranks of atheists. To which we would welcome you, by the way.


There are more atheists in traditional religion than anywhere else. Thatís my problem with religion. Another is that I cannot tolerate someone being a spiritual authority over me. That just ainít gunna happen. There are too many people in church saying they believe in God but living as if He didnít exist.

Quote:
I am not afraid of the dark. Or the things that lurk in it.


Well said.

Quote:
orangeitis wrote View Post
That's a mighty set of claims. Do you have empirical evidence prepared to support them?


Funny you should say. I was just talking with God in my prayer journal last night and saying that Veridicanism is the only thing I can fight atheism with. It feeds off of traditional religious notions like AIDS use the immune cells to spread its disease. I can defend the fact that God is the monistic entity of fundamental consciousness and that the Human purpose is to be Christ. I canít defend Catholic or Protestant theology. Hell, I canít even understand how Catholicism developed from the teachings of Christ in the first place.
Egor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:34 AM   #188
Egor
Member
 
Egor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Quote:
Eternal wrote View Post
Even more baffling is how he can claim God is monistic, when he can't even provide a clear, concise definition of God.

God is the monistic entity of fundamental consciousness. The revelation of God to an individual (which is what I think you are really getting at) is variable. It is different for each person who reads the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. Thatís because each person has a different mission to do as Christ. So when you shout out to Christ, the echo you get back will sound different to you than the echo I get back. We each have our own thing to do in Christ.

The verse in my signatureÖoh, I forgotÖin this forum, I canít have a signature, or an avatar. Well, anyway, there is a verse in the Gospel of John that goes like this.

Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my Fatherís house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

These verses are not about heaven. They are about our purpose in Christ that we were uniquely designed to fulfill in our lifetime here on earth. The second coming of Christ is not in the cloudsóitís when you become Christ!


Quote:
ILOVEJESUS wrote View Post
He has already admitted to having made this religion up has he not?


Yeah, itís my invention. Of course, I believe God has given me the ideas. Over nearly twenty years, I have seen how God has moved in this way in my life, and I am sure that He is behind all of this. I donít know why. I donít know if itís just for me or if it is for others, too. I donít know if Iím simply going to preach it until I die, and then some time after, others will take hold of it, or if it will just fade away. But what else am I going to do? What else does one do with a life than move on what they believe they have been designed for.

It kind of makes sense that God would create a personality like mine if he wanted to start a new religion. I donít back down. Iím highly intelligent. I love to fight. I have a massive ego and need to feed it. Iíve had a lifelong two-way communication with God. Iíve studied every kind of religion there is. I have spiritual gifts that most people donít have. Iím a writer and a damn good publisher (at least technically. Of course, I canít sell a book worth a damn). Iím not encumbered by raising children. And Iíve been all over the world (including Scotland). With all that, I know how to care for people, and I honestly feel fulfilled in doing that line of work (being a nurse). In other words, Iím not some academic whoís always got my head down, and Iím not someone who left the Church and threw out God and Christ when I did. Thatís pretty rare.

And when I look at the events of my life from my earliest memories until today, I see a design that I did not intend. Now at my age, I can see enough of the design to tell where it is going.

Quote:
Eternal wrote View Post
Even more baffling is how he can claim God is monistic, when he can't even provide a clear, concise definition of God.


God is the monistic entity of fundamental consciousness. The revelation of God to an individual (which is what I think you are really getting at) is variable. It is different for each person who reads the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. Thatís because each person has a different mission to do as Christ. So when you shout out to Christ, the echo you get back will sound different to you than the echo I get back. We each have our own thing to do in Christ.

The verse in my signatureÖoh, I forgotÖin this forum, I canít have a signature, or an avatar. Well, anyway, there is a verse in the Gospel of John that goes like this.

Last edited by Professor Chaos; 02-06-2012 at 12:05 PM.
Egor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:53 AM   #189
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 12,961
What a twat.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:05 PM   #190
Professor Chaos
General of the Attacking Army
 
Professor Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,904
I don't understand...He has a signature.

I will grieve. Grief is not a theistic concept. ~ Sternwallow
Professor Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:07 PM   #191
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 12,961
so he does.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:13 PM   #192
Davin
Obsessed Member
 
Davin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: One the armpits of the U.S. of A.
Posts: 2,585
I wonder if it realises that it repeated itself in the same post.

Always question all authorities because the authority you don't question is the most dangerous... except me, never question me.
Davin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:23 PM   #193
Smellyoldgit
Stinkin' Mod
 
Smellyoldgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Britland
Posts: 12,961
Quote:
Davin wrote View Post
I wonder if it realises that it repeated itself in the same post.
Indeed - I lost count after 14 sacks of bullshit.

Stop the Holy See men!
Smellyoldgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:26 PM   #194
Stargazer
Obsessed Member
 
Stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,727
Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
Yep. In fact, Iím at a crossroads right now. I have tried in the past to be a traditional Christian, but I have failed each time. This time around, itís as if God has tricked me back into being a Veridican. I have tried to leave it behind, but I canít seem to do it. So, I guess itís my purpose in life to go forward with it.

I have never written down a concise and definite version of Veridicanism, except for the two tenets (God is monistic in nature, and the human purpose is to be Christ.). But where Iím at in my book right now necessitates it. I have been trying to let this cup pass from me, but it wonít go away.

The crossroads is this: I believe everyone should form their own religion from reading the Gospels (that is, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and also Thomas). Everyone should walk their own path. There shouldnít be 35,000 denominations of Christianity; there should be 6 billion denominations. But I also realize that can be like feeding an infant by setting a can of chili in front of him or her along with a can opener. So I may have to set out a system of belief whether I want to or not.
Actually, Egor, this sounds a lot like Gnosticism. My background: I have been an atheist all my life (can remember not believing stuff taught at Sunday School around age 8), yet I went to a Baptist university, majoring in English. It was required to take religion courses there, and I did. I took the required Bible course and I also took comparative religions. There I learned about Gnosticism, and have done a lot of reading on that subject and many others on religion since college. I have read the Bible, Koran, Book of Mormon, Mahabarata, you name it.

Gnosticim, as I understand it, is where each person has to, through learning, find God for him/herself. These groups were supported in the early church, but were declared heretical later on and people were hunted and killed for it.

But the idea of finding God through individual learning, sounds much like what you are doing.

Also, though, if you read enough Gnostic literature, it begins to sound kind of like Buddhism, which I think is not a religion but a philosophy.







Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
I donít know what you mean by ďSolid, substantial proof.Ē If you want to see God physically, then you have to look at his physical body, and that is the universe. If you want to connect with God spiritually, then you have to grow closer to him by living out your purpose, which is to become His consciousness within His creation. You donít meet God; you wake up to God. If you want to feel Godís love for you, then you must be willing to be one with God.
By proof I mean something that shows direct evidence of God, not implied evidence, where you have to make a leap of faith to accept it. That's where any example of the Argument From Design breaks down, and you've seen Ex Atheist give numerous examples along the lines of: Look at (the human eye, a mosquito, whatever). It is very complex. Therefore (LEAP) there MUST be a God.



Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
I wouldnít even go there. The medical field is not dominated by atheism. Far, far from it. I have never met an atheist nurse that I know of. All of them have been quite spiritually-minded. Most doctors, Iíve met, quite frankly, are Hindu. My Anatomy and Physiology professor was the one who said, ďIf youíre not a believer when you start this class; you will be when you finish.Ē Meaning that the complexity and design of the human body was enough to make anyone believe in God.
Argument From Design, see above.

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
Evidence-based care is what nurses are supposed to go by, and we do. In other words, what has been proven to work, we use. Thatís why in psychiatry, we assess patients for religious beliefs, because solid religious beliefs can be an asset in their healing. Hyper-religiosity, which is a sign of delusion and psychosis, is not the same thing as true religious belief. There is a huge difference between a patient being able to focus on reading the Bible and a patient who walks around with a Bible to ward off demons. I know that from the outside, it seems that medicine is this great atheistic research laboratory where people are healed with all the confidence of science, but in truth itís not that way. There are medicines that work on infections, pain, tumor growth, and the positive symptoms of mental illness. There are procedures you can do to fix the body when it is broke, but people heal on their own. You stich a laceration together, and God takes it from there. You inject epinephrine and atropine and do chest compressions and ventilate a dying man, maybe you apply an electric shock to the heart, but none of that makes a person live. Most people in cardiac arrest will still die. No one would ever suggest that medicine should be scrapped and faith healing should ensue. God has given us our technological advancement. But there is the illusion of medical science and there is the clinical reality of what it can do. Thatís why a lot of people prefer nursing over being a physician. Some of us believe that caring for a patient never fails, whereas medicine, in the long run, always failsówe all die.
This just shows that medicine in some ways is still stuck in the last century. Anyone with a strong enough positive attitude has a better chance of healing. This has been in many articles I had read lately. But can the person (I HATE the term patient) do this with the strength of their own mind, or do they need a crutch (God) to accomplish it? I would say mental resiliency is to be credited to the individual person, not to some invisible being. Just as Tim Tebow is responsible for winning his own football games, not God, even though he would probably say so.

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
There are more atheists in traditional religion than anywhere else. Thatís my problem with religion. Another is that I cannot tolerate someone being a spiritual authority over me. That just ainít gunna happen. There are too many people in church saying they believe in God but living as if He didnít exist.
If a person believes in God he/she is not an atheist. Let us be careful with our definition of terms.

Quote:
Egor wrote View Post
Funny you should say. I was just talking with God in my prayer journal last night and saying that Veridicanism is the only thing I can fight atheism with. It feeds off of traditional religious notions like AIDS use the immune cells to spread its disease. I can defend the fact that God is the monistic entity of fundamental consciousness and that the Human purpose is to be Christ. I canít defend Catholic or Protestant theology. Hell, I canít even understand how Catholicism developed from the teachings of Christ in the first place
No defending necessary. Just give us concrete proof (defined above) of God.

I thought you said you didn't care what any of us thought? So, you do care? I do wish you would make up your mind already. - NKB

Last edited by Stargazer; 02-06-2012 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Spelling, the usual
Stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:27 PM   #195
Eternal
Thank God Iím an atheist
 
Eternal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Little Britain
Posts: 1,076
Nope, it doesn't matter how many times you read it, it's still rubbish.

Anyways, by any chance have you read the second coming of christ by Paramahansa Yogananda. If not then i suggest you read it, because everything you say could be coming from his divine lips (except for the bit about the beer and superbowl). I think you may find your book has already been written, maybe not, I wouldn't presume to know the contents of your book, but if it resembles your dribblings here then there is a good chance. Paramahansa Yogananda was a hindu who was a big shouter about jeebus, and thought that jesus and krishna were watching over us hand in hand, and that jesus was essentially a yogi that we should all try to emulate.

He set up an organisation to extol his own brand of religion called the self realisation fellowship. Look them up, you might finally find somewhere you belong.

"Belief means not wanting to know what is true"
Friedrich Nietzsche
Eternal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000 - , Raving Atheists [dot] com frequency-supranational frequency-supranational