Hen walks to her eggs and sitting on them!

[Smellyoldgit]

[Davin]

ahoba wrote

I think you can't answer.

That is true, I can't answer a question that is doesn't make sense.

[ahoba]

Davin wrote

That is true, I can't answer a question that is doesn't make sense.

If you are serious, I will explain them in more details.

[Smellyoldgit]

ahoba wrote

If you are serious, I will explain them in more details.

How about you take your ridiculous, tedious trolling shit somewhere else - you've shown your true colours and fucking off would be a good idea.

[Davin]

ahoba wrote

If you are serious, I will explain them in more details.

I doubt that you can ask a cogent question.

[Michael]

Yes! For once I'm ahead of the game.

[ahoba]

Michael wrote

Yes! For once I'm ahead of the game.

Game!!!!

Again and again, I am asking questions not to change your thought but to find answers from you not else!!

I cannot imagine something created without creator as I cannot imagine a program without a programmer! That is it!!

Is this question not deserve an answer?!!

Still you think I am here for playing!!!

If you don't want to answer, can you please show me any article can answer my questions.


Regards,

[dogpet]

ahoba wrote

I cannot imagine something created without creator as I cannot imagine a program without a programmer! That is it!!

Yet you imagine programmer exist forever? Good imagination You are creative person like he who wrote programmer.

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

"A computer program must be created by a person"
If this is extraordinary claim I will answer you

If I say you are a human being although I have never seen you, is this extraordinary claim?

Come on !

Best regards,

That is a big ol non sequitur.

A computer program also requires a computer which is also a product of human design.

Genes are not a computer program.

You're attributing human attributes "programmer, designer" to things not human.

You've created a god in your own image. And then somehow believe it is the other way around. Ever wonder why you do that?

[ahoba]

Hobotronic2037 wrote

That is a big ol non sequitur.

A computer program also requires a computer which is also a product of human design.

Genes are not a computer program.

You're attributing human attributes "programmer, designer" to things not human.

You've created a god in your own image. And then somehow believe it is the other way around. Ever wonder why you do that?

Genes are not a computer program of course! like a car is not a computer. Nest also is not a computer.

So, If I ask who creates the hen, this is not extraordinary question!

You're attributing human attributes "programmer, designer" to things not human.

not human? like a bird for example??!!

You've created a god in your own image. And then somehow believe it is the other way around. Ever wonder why you do that?

I don't imagine a God! I just ask a valid question!

[dogpet]

ahoba wrote

I don't imagine a God! I just ask a valid question!

shy bairns get nae sweeties

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

So, If I ask who creates the hen, this is not extraordinary question?

Of course it isn't an extraordinary question. The answer is "nobody."

What I said was extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I said nothing about extraordinary questions.

Someone creating chickens would be an extraordinary claim, would you agree?

[Michael]

Hey guys, I found the creator!

Making Chickens

Who knew he would turn out to be weird semi-homeless looking guy?

[ahoba]

Hobotronic2037 wrote

Of course it isn't an extraordinary question. The answer is "nobody."

What I said was extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I said nothing about extraordinary questions.

Sorry! But I have already answered you. Saying “the creator is exist” is not extraordinary claim.

Hobotronic2037 wrote

Someone creating chickens would be an extraordinary claim, would you agree?

100% no! And you should not say it is extraordinary claim. If a chicken can be created by natural processes without intervention of a mediator, no issue with existing someone who can use same processes to create the chicken. I think this is very clear. You should be the first one who agrees.

If you think I raise extraordinary claim, you also do the same.

Regards,

[Hobotronic2037]

ahoba wrote

Sorry! But I have already answered you. Saying “the creator is exist” is not extraordinary claim.


100% no! And you should not say it is extraordinary claim. If a chicken can be created by natural processes without intervention of a mediator, no issue with existing someone who can use same processes to create the chicken. I think this is very clear. You should be the first one who agrees.

If you think I raise extraordinary claim, you also do the same.

Regards,

Guess we'll just agree to disagree then. Have a nice life.