07-01-2018, 10:10 PM
|
#271
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
your not an expert in physics so I will forgive you.
renormalization is a joke
I point to it because it's an effort by underlings to get rid of infinities
you said there is no infinities
as a chemist I bet you know nothing of electrochemistry
|
No, renormalisation is not a joke. You're the joke.
And you think Heisenberg was an 'underling'? I see.
I didn't say that there are no infinities. I said that there isn't an infinite amount of energy in a finite amount of space. Learn to read you dense pillock.
Regarding your chemistry quote, there you go again, making assumptions about which you know nothing. Just like your energy assumption - all bollocks.
You are a fuckin' idiot who needs to go back on his meds.
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:17 PM
|
#272
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
But you are still a twat so you didn't.
|
in fact I bet you don't even have a job in chemistry
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:19 PM
|
#273
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
No, renormalisation is not a joke.
|
prove it
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:21 PM
|
#274
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
in fact I bet you don't even have a job in chemistry
|
Look you fuckin' imbecile, learn to read. I wrote that I studied chemistry, not that I worked in chemistry. I don't as it happens because it's too badly paid.
Wanker.
At least I don't write bollocks about some energy shit, like you.
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:25 PM
|
#275
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
prove it
|
He who asserts provides the proof.
You asserted that renormalisation is a joke. It is up to you to offer proof.
I didn't assert. I merely responded to your assertion. So, little boy, off you go ...
Let's hear the proof.
(Why do I feel that I'm going to get bored stupid and frustrated by this inconsequential little oik?)
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:30 PM
|
#276
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
Look you fuckin' imbecile, learn to read. I wrote that I studied chemistry, not that I worked in chemistry. I don't as it happens because it's too badly paid.
Wanker.
At least I don't write bollocks about some energy shit, like you.
|
I ran a power plant for two an a half years doing chemistry everyday on the boilers. $24/hour
I also did chemistry for an environmental testing lab for six months. $8/hour I got to do my own chemistry experiments for free... making potassium L-ascorbate.
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:34 PM
|
#277
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
He who asserts provides the proof.
You asserted that renormalisation is a joke. It is up to you to offer proof.
I didn't assert. I merely responded to your assertion. So, little boy, off you go ...
Let's hear the proof.
(Why do I feel that I'm going to get bored stupid and frustrated by this inconsequential little oik?)
|
its an ad hoc attempt to get rid of infinities
there is no special axioms or deductions, in fact it produces no results and has no value
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:49 PM
|
#278
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
I ran a power plant for two an a half years doing chemistry everyday on the boilers. $24/hour
I also did chemistry for an environmental testing lab for six months. $8/hour I got to do my own chemistry experiments for free... making potassium L-ascorbate.
|
So fuckin' what?
This statement is about as pointless as your energy bollocks.
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:54 PM
|
#279
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
So fuckin' what?
This statement is about as pointless as your energy bollocks.
|
it means I am more of an expert in chemistry than you, and that is what you studied
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 10:57 PM
|
#280
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
its an ad hoc attempt to get rid of infinities
there is no special axioms or deductions, in fact it produces no results and has no value
|
What?
You little, bleedin' imbecile.
I'm disappointed in you. Very disappointed.
Without quantisation, (a renormalisation feature), the energy in a finite volume of space would be infinite. With quantisation, the energy in a finite volume of space is finite, as is to be expected. You CANNOT say that this produces no results and has no value.
Jesus. Is this all you have? You are a waste of space. You are piss poor.
You are going to have to do far better to impress.
Fuck-a-doodle-doo. What a wanker.
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 11:02 PM
|
#281
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
it means I am more of an expert in chemistry than you, and that is what you studied
|
I doubt that. You got paid 8$ an hour as a lab assistant and you CLAIM to be an expert? Are you fuckin' serious? I wouldn't even turn over in bed let alone actually get out of bed for that piece of loose change.
That's you all over, isn't it? You gain a little knowledge and then make some very bold (invalid) assumptions based on fuck all. However, and more importantly, I'm whooping your ass at physics you piss poor little oik. Let's face it, ten years later, you are still pumping out the same old shit having got nowhere. I bet you're real proud (not). 
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 11:18 PM
|
#282
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
What?
You little, bleedin' imbecile.
I'm disappointed in you. Very disappointed.
Without quantisation, (a renormalisation feature), the energy in a finite volume of space would be infinite. With quantisation, the energy in a finite volume of space is finite, as is to be expected. You CANNOT say that this produces no results and has no value.
Jesus. Is this all you have? You are a waste of space. You are piss poor.
You are going to have to do far better to impress.
Fuck-a-doodle-doo. What a wanker.
|
name the results and value
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 11:24 PM
|
#283
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
hertz vanrental wrote
I doubt that. You got paid 8$ an hour as a lab assistant and you CLAIM to be an expert? Are you fuckin' serious? I wouldn't even turn over in bed let alone actually get out of bed for that piece of loose change.
That's you all over, isn't it? You gain a little knowledge and then make some very bold (invalid) assumptions based on fuck all. However, and more importantly, I'm whooping your ass at physics you piss poor little oik. Let's face it, ten years later, you are still pumping out the same old shit having got nowhere. I bet you're real proud (not). 
|
I claim to be more of an expert in chemistry than you, re; strawman fallacy
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 11:29 PM
|
#284
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Come on mumble butt wee. Show us all that you have. We all need (another) good laugh. We all need to see what a highly emotional idiot like you who's off his meds and who CLAIMS to know all about energy has.
So far, all we've heard is illogical shit.
Surely you have better than this?
OK, 10 years ago, you didn't, but now, after 10 years of mental masturbation, you must have something more entertaining? No?
So, off you go. Let's hear it before we all fall asleep with boredom.
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
07-01-2018, 11:32 PM
|
#285
|
Obsessed Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,734
|
Quote:
HumbleBeauty wrote
name the results and value
|
I did, or do you have difficulty reading?
Do I sound like a fuckin' people person?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM.
|